Q.E.D. please be nicer

Because I am a busybody I suppose. But please get over yourself, I haven’t said boo to you in quite a while. I don’t give much thought to you one way or another and you raised the ugliness of paying off posters with your lame joke.

I answered as I felt like it. Your question got a curt reply from Q.E.D. and I tried for something a little different and you got bent out of shape over it and acted like I was stalking you. This thread is of direct interest to me. You raised a question that I thought my opinion might actually help with. I was wrong again.

You don’t normally bug me a third as much as a few posters on this board that I generally avoid. Your response to my post is of course well within your rights, especially in the pit, but what the fuck? What did I say to piss you off?

Jim

That would be “butted” in.

I’m not pissed off. Just forget about it.

Not necessarily. Maybe he’s a tree. After all, it is nearly spring.

Wouldn’t that be budded out? :wink:

And yet another typical typo from me. :smack:

Really? He’s prolific. He himself has admitted he can be snarky. Snarky is somewhere on the continuum that runs from polite to rude to jerk - and its certainly further along the rude/jerk end than towards the polite end. People who have been on the receiving end of his snark are likely to remember it, and when you snark as frequently as Q.E.D. does…

I just hadn’t noticed any on-board dislike for him. It is not like he gets pitted very often. I guess I have avoid his snark. I only noticed it in the other thread as I was looking forward to an answer to bbs2k’s question.

I read almost every thread in ATMB. There aren’t many and I sometimes I learn fun things like the 200 post per page option or that there was a chance of a Game and Sports forum being added.

You need a hobby!

Fantasy literature can be very diverting.

As to the OP, Q.E.D. has a posting style that a significant number of posters find to be episodically but persistently abrasive. He knows it and doesn’t appear to particularly care. That’s a pity, because the board would be better served if one of our most informative and prolific posters managed to blunt that tendency a bit more.

:smiley: I might have to try that Tolkien fellow I have heard so much about.

ATMB is pretty slow moving. It takes a no more than 10 minutes a day to keep up with it.

Q.E.D.. Please read, digest, and act upon this advice from one of the most helpful experts on this Board.

*The bolding in QtM’s post is mine–sc

Hah!

I must say, this is one of the nicest Pit threads I have ever read. Y’all are being so polite while twisting those daggers…

g, d, & r before one ends up in my back :wink:

I was going to write my solution to this early this morning, but resisted. Seeing that no one has made the point, I’ll add it now.

Be funnier. Seriously, make the snark a little funnier, it’ll be tolerated better.
If that proves easier said than done, than follow Qadgop’s advice.

Hah what? Now that QED has achieved some modicum of attention, you can somehow manage to keep flying under the radar despite being one of the most blatant and annoying trolls we’ve had in years?

I’m afraid you might be right. Hah, then!

That’s exactly it. Mean-spirited, puerile clunk is ineffective snark.

You really don’t know what you’re doing, do you?

And people call me a prick.

I remember why I didn’t post this morning.

Nothing here, move along everyone.

**Q.E.D. **and I have had words numerous times in the past and I actually agree with most of the people posting to this thread that he’s snarkier than he needs to or should be but you’re full of it if you think he’s “one of the most blatant and annoying trolls we’ve had in years”.

I believe the object of that comment was bbs2k, not QED