I generally find his threads and posts to be thoroughly uninteresting. To the point where I usually don’t even bother to open a thread if I see he’s the OP.
But I like the “Kimchee Wangdoodle” line!
I generally find his threads and posts to be thoroughly uninteresting. To the point where I usually don’t even bother to open a thread if I see he’s the OP.
But I like the “Kimchee Wangdoodle” line!
The transparent “just asking questions” bit (which a few other idiots also do, but mostly in GQ) does differs from the way other annoying posters in GD post, since they make at least make some attempt to inform. Has anyone learned a single thing from Kimchee Wangdoodle?
I learned that encyclopedic knowledge does not equal wisdom.
I’ve learned that encyclopedic knowledge doesn’t equal intelligence.
I’m still not convinced he isn’t a douchebag troll in his 40s. Setting up a fake facebook account is doable. And even if he’s ten years old, he’s still a douchebag.
I’m pretty sure Qin Shi is just an even-more socially retarded reincarnation of START.
As per the typo in the title, he just needs go on and pupate already, and do us all a favor.
I’ve explained my reasons above and there are plenty of people who peddle their personal dogmas here often in a far more monomaniacal way than me.
Most of those people are eventually banned. And many of them are able to at least pretend that their dogma is based on any sort of real-world application of that dogma. Having a barely-teenager peddle his personal dogma strikes the rest of us as a phase we went through when we knew it all and felt compelled to share our insights, too.
None of them are respected posters. You’re not either.
I have a feeling that “personal dogma” would make a great cartoon. It’s just too bad I’m not the person to draw it.
Would you draw monomaniacal with a monocle?
Another thing is that other posters here generally talk about their lives and interesting stuff that they are personally involved with and things like that, whether it’s their hobbies, their kids, their pets, games that they are playing, sports that they are following, books that they are reading, their thoughts about phenomena in pop culture, things like that. Qin/Curtis does nothing but post about his dogmatic political and religious opinions.
For God’s sake, man, at least try to open up about some stuff going on in your own life that others can relate to, instead of just being a robot of right-wing religious claptrap.
The Big Irony of it is that the boy, if boy he be – quite a big assumption, I think now – is that he is a living, breathing, walking pro-abortion advertisement and (supposedly) does not even realize it.
Ouch.
I do post about other stuff such as my personal problems or mundane matters, please check my post or thread history.
Considering you’re on my Ignore List you won’t see this but could you tell me what exactly made you put me on your Ignore List.
You’re a puerile, jingoistic sack of poop that can’t see past the partisan bumpersticker you have over your eyes?
That would be my guess.
Pretty much. But if you don’t mind, I’d consider it a favor if you did not quote the “little laddie” in your replies.
Ah yes that’s why I support legalizing marijuana, and repealing DADT. :rolleyes:
Well, let’s see, there is nothing inherently contradictory about a puerile, jingoist poop-sack being okay with repealing DADT and legalizing MJ.
So, you must be taking issue with the partisan claim. I contend that you are blindly and stupidly Republican and will never throw the lever for a Democrat. That is, when you are finally able to enter a voting booth. If in fact you are a tween.
So please, don’t roll your eyes just because you’re too fucking stupid to understand things said plain.
No, obviously if I agreed with the Democrat (or Libertarian or Socialist or Federalist or Whig) more than the Republican I’d vote for the former. And considering how quite a few forum members have said they’d never vote for a Republican maybe you should be calling them blind partisans? :rolleyes: