You didn’t penalize me for doubting you, did you?
Why would he?
Don’t you think it’s reasonable to ask about the point-awarding system?
Do you think that life after death is a viable concept for the working classes,
bearing in mind Marx’s dictum that religion is merely a panacea to paper
over the cracks of a decaying society ?
Must we drag Marxism into this?
Now that he’s aware of the tally sheet, does it seem like pjd is just trolling for points with that question?
Should we establish a panel of judges amongst ourselves to decide if pjd’s question was worth any points?
Any volunteers?
What are the qualifications? Where would a potentially interested person send a resume?
Does anyone else feel that qualified members of the panel should have a degree in Tibetan Poetry?
Don’t you think that seems self-evident?
Are there any other minimum judge qualifications we should establish? Like maybe criteria that would disqualify one from being a judge?
What about a degree in Vogon poetry?
We can’t have anybody whose I.Q. is above 99 can we?
Oh, and PJD, would you believe that your question, above, gets you 10.5 points?
What good is half a point?
Do get extra points if you get them in the right order ?
Does .25 points for each of you do it for you?
Is it just me or does anyone else find that to be quite unsatisfactory?
Who else thinks that points should be awarded in multiples of pi?
If we started awarding points based on pi, where would that end?