Quoting Extremely Long Posts...

There is currently a Pit thread where one of our newer members is trying out the Moon Hoax theory again. His OP is quite a screed - I can’t bring myself to read the whole thing, but it is many, many paragraphs long with dozens of embedded links.

Some of the replies to this re-quote the whole OP and then add a single line (TL;DR or “Cite?” or the like).

Is it any extra burden on the server or the hamsters to quote such a long post? I know there is, or used to be, a size limit on posts, and I am sure our latest Moon hoaxer is pushing it, but does it mess anything up to quote the thing?

Regards,
Shodan

Which post are you talking about? Could you repost it here?

This one. You were post #10.

ETA: and you made a funny.

I blame my new meds(Zoloft)…unless it really was funny, then I give full credit to my new meds(Zoloft).

'Twas funny. Gimme a few of them zoloft.

“Cite?” was funny, but this was the topper:

:smiley:

IIRC, courtesy recommends only to quote the most salient part of a post in which to offer a comment, rebuttal, maintain the thread flow, etc.

In the thread in question, it appears Czarcasm, among others, was doing just that.

+1

I’m amazed anyone read past the first sentence of the OP in question. Thereafter, It was rather annoying having to scroll through it the first time, let alone several more times. Quoting that wall of text is like responding to a fart in an elevator by farting. It’s only funny to the guy passing gas.

I think people who quote several pages or paragraphs just to add a one line response to the bottom that could’ve been made just as well without quoting at all should be moderated. Not a warning, but a “mod note, this is bad practice” type of thing. This board is way better about it than the rest of the internet, but we should actively discourage what little remains.

Does anyone know if it constitutes extra load for the servers or the MB software to re-quote very long posts? That’s what I would like to know.

Regards,
Shodan

Seems to me that in general long re-posts are bad manners but in this particular instance it was done for comedic purpose. Lets be honest, no one here is going to take that OP seriously so it’s not like it’s shitting up a good thread.

^And if wasted electrons are a huge concern, well there’s the irony of this lil chat going on for. . .what, a quarter page?

On the flipside, I thought there was a rule that informs us not to snip out a portion of a quoted post but instead to quote a post in its entirety.

Is this just an informal guideline, am I mis-remembering or did my search just now not take me there? I read through the rules on Posting and such… and came up empty-handed.

I believe it’s ok to snip if the snipping doesn’t change the intended meaning. IANAMod.

There has never been such a rule. The major rule about attributed quotes within the quote box is that they should not be edited to change their meaning. You may quote parts of posts. Within a quoted section, you may also edit out parts while inserting an ellipsis, [snip], or other indication of the edit.

I found it hilarious, FTR. But I have a working scroll wheel. Those who don’t might not find it as amusing.

That said, c’mon: the thread was preposterous to begin with.

Excellent, thank you for the clarification.

It seems to be OK to snip quotes as long as it doesn’t change the meaning.

Can I modify other posters’ quotes?

(slightly altered the inner quote tags so they didn’t bollix up the coding)