ralph124c - ENOUGH!

OK, I can’t think of what word you’re trying to avoid using (email it to me if you like), but I’d call it drive-by posting (unless that’s the word we’re not allowed to use). Most frustrating to me is when the intial post is vague or unclear but the original poster doesn’t return to clarify the question. If I ask a question, either factual or opinion, I try to at least post a thank you to those who replied.

Surprisingly, very little. I did a search on his username and “threads started by”. I didn’t even have to check the second page of his threads - those are the last 25 threads he’s started. I did make sure he exhibited the same behavior in each of them, as he seems the sort to point to the sole exception to prove his rule.

Yes it does:

Fartsucker.
Shitmold.
Cockmaggot.

And many more.

We could try to self-implement a “ralph124c rule.” We could all refuse to post in any thread he starts, as well as refuse to acknowledge any of his posts at all.

That wouldn’t be any fun, though. :wink:

Yikes. Remind me not to piss you guys off!

Can anyone point me to where it says we can’t use “that” word? I didn’t know that particular rule.

I would remind you all, that I have:
-provided GOOD CLEAN fun to thousands of you!
-I have PLUMBED the depths of human depravity, FOR YOU SHITS!!
-I have DARED to say things that lurk in all of YOUR SICK, TWISTED MINDS!
-I am (no exaggeration) one of the most popular posters on the SMDB, providing enjoyment (and derision) for all!
Any YOU DARE! to impugn my honor!
To Hell with you all!

The moron’s (or idiot’s – there is some question as to which) repeated and unsupported attacks against lawyers get a bit long in the tooth after a while.

Because you’re a moron. Pure, simple, clean, fresh. You’re a moron, largely unpopular I might add.

Sam

According to who, sherlock?

I’m not having any fun. Work harder.

So you can unclog toilets, what does this have to do with your posting habits?

If you knew what lurked in my mind, you’re be cowering in the closet.

Most popular pitting target, perhaps. Though I must say it’s one of the most amusing pits I’ve read in a while. (Kudos Munch)

That’s why we’re here.

Pass me the marshmallows, would ya?

I find him amusing. But I’m easily amused.

Honestly I don’t think I ever noticed him before this Pit thread. And the only reason I noticed him is someone commented in an e-mail that he was getting Pitted. And I value this person’s input. So I came to see, and finally noticed him.

So much for most popular Doper. :rolleyes: (Hey! A valid reason to use that little guy!)

In ATMB, the FAQ covers this. One post specifically tells us “Do not …”.

We are all he has.

Ralph has his shining moments:

Is it just me, or is anybody else hearing this in their minds as they read the quoted post?

“Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?”

Now, THAT’S scary!

:slight_smile:

Troll. The word is troll. It’s not like you aren’t allowed to say the actual word “troll”.

I’m sure the mods are fooled by the way Munch cleverly concealed his accusation. They’ll never catch on to what he meant by “There’s a word for that, but we’re not allowed to use it.”

Hey, somebody has to challenge duffer now that Roland Deschain has been banned.

Don’ts points 2 and 3 run opposite to point 1?

Huh? How do you figure?

Can you translate this one to English please, with some kind of understandable punctuation and capitalization?

Ah, ah, ah, Munch. As Giraffe so eloquently noted, there are many descriptors you can use. Coyly saying-without-saying the one we don’t want tossed around just undercuts your point. Stones and glass houses and all that.

TVeblen
Pit mod