Rate the group's Combined Sexual Quotient

Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share
1

After reading the thread discussing the attractiveness or lack thereof regarding musical performers, I realized how unfair it is to catagorized a group based on the physical traits of just one person.

I think we should take a good hard look at the entire group and decide if one person can be cute enough for the whole group or if collectively they still only add up to a 3.
We should rate them from 1 to 5 for their combined sexual quotient. All traits should be taken into account such as physical attractiveness, musical ability and sheer animal magnetism.

1= not even with someone else’s body
2=it’s late and I’m too horny to care anymore
3=average boy or girl next door
4=pretty but not quite a model
5=OH MY GOD, YES DO ME NOW

For illustration purposes I’ll start with Sugar Ray.
Singer, Mark is a 5, others are 3’s and 4’s average score is 3.5 averaged out the whole group is do-able

INX Michael (was) a five but the others in the group were 1’s,2’s and 3’s and their combined total might average out to 2.5 Not quite up to par.

So rate your favorite group.

2

Doesn’t exactly answer your question, I know…

I was thinking about questions you could ask about the Beatles:

  1. Who was the best songwriter?
  2. Who was the best singer?
  3. Who was the best with his instrument?
  4. Who was the most attractive?

Chances are, you didn’t answer Ringo for any of the above.

3

Metallica: James Hetfield (lead singer, second guitar) gets a 5. Jason Newsted (bass), I’ll give him a 4 because he does this monster-voice thing that really gets me. Lars Ulrich (drums) and Kirk Hammett (bass) each get a 2. Average out to 3.25

Sons of the Desert averages out to 4.25

4

Nashville Pussy?

Blaine Cartwright - 1
Ruyter Suys - 5
Corey Parks - 5
Jeremy Thompson - 1
uhhh, total 3.
Sangre Amado?

Stone- 5
Jesika- 5
Little Sunshine- 4
Woohoo, a 4.666 How apropriate.