In a thread about an alleged Manafort-Assange connection and an implied Assange-Russia connection that would make the former connection unseamly, it is not a contribution to question the latter connection?
In the same thread, pointing out that the evidence for the connection largely relies on statements by extreme hawks and known perjurers is also not a contribution.
Apparently featherweight potshots are a contribution judging from most of the threads around here. It’s only a problem when there is a devastating rejoinder from a right winger. Yes I understand the desire to be patted on the head by leftists as an approved conservative like Max Boot or Bill Kristol.
That is some petty stuff, bud.