obligatory link
Reeder you sir are a dipshit. You give exactly zero respect to any one with a differing opinion. Your over use of the damn rolleyes smile is inapporpiate for GD and clearly shows that your a giant putz. Oh look we even have a little smile for that :wally. I could also mention your poor excuses for GD posts and OPs but that has done by many people (including me once if I remember). In conclusion I cordially invite you to go fuck yourself.
Actually, he was right, & you were wrong.
Reeder & I occasionally disagree, but in fairness I must defend him.
BTW-- his use of rolleyes is an “insult”? :dubious:
All in all, you are… :wally
Ahh yes…pitted by another Bushco minion.
'cuse me while I go cut 'nother notch on my bedpost.
Life is good.
This is one of the most petty pit threads I’ve seen in a long while.
Jesus, treis, you asked for a cite and Reeder gave you one. What the fuck is your fucking problem? Are you going to start pitting everybody who proves you wrong in a GD thread?
Oh…and as to the rolleyes…
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
And why don’t I just go ahead and add a :wally
:
First of all did not provide a cite for what he claimed.
Second of all yes using the rolleyes smile is an insult. It conveys that I found your post so stupid and absurd that it caused me to roll my eyes.
Exactly. Anyone who see’s Bushco’s “apology” as a true apology…deserves many :rolleyes:
But I’m stingy with mine.
You will be deserving more I’m sure.
:rolleyes:
…and I almost NEVER use smileys, so take that as an indication of the depth of your stupidity.
well, duh. :rolleyes:
Haven’t read the link, so no answer to the OP at all, but that just needed to be said.
Uhm the OP mentioned nothing about asking for and recieving a cite. It was about his use of the rolleyes smile at the end of his post responding to mine.
Alright Rummy we know its you…!
I see you chose to take the high road, treis. From linked thread:
Nah, if it were Rumsfeld, it would go:
“Reeder, are you, sir, a dipshit? The answer is yes! Do you give exactly zero respect to any one[sic] with a differing opinion? The answer is yes! Is your over use[sic] of the damn rolleyes smile inapporpiate[sic] for GD and clearly show that your[sic] a giant putz? The answer is yes! Do we have a little smile for that? The answer is :wally! Could I also mention your poor excuses for GD posts and OPs? The answer is yes, but that has done by many people (including me once if I remember). Do I, in conclusion, cordially invite you to go fuck yourself? The answer is yes!”
Well then I stand corrected, sort of. You linked to this pit thread in a post responding to Reeder’s cite so I figured that had something to do with it. I didn’t think anyone would be thin-skinned enough to pit someone over nothing but a rolleyes smilie. I guess I was wrong.
AND let me note that the post I cite above is from a Great Debates thread!
You lose! :wally
Cheddarsnax yes I do remember that thread and I used the rolleyes to express my opinion that his post was indeed stupid. I had referred to a cite given by Simonx in my four previous posts. Elucidator then asked me for a cite with a little comment with it and my rolleyes was intended to show that I thought his/her’s post was indeed stupid. Inappropiate for GD? probably but it was just a response to elucidator.
In this case I don’t think I had said anything that could be considered stupid. My only claim was that the U.S. didn’t want any more violence and Reeder gave me the rolleye’s and I thought it was inappropiate.
You also didn’t believe Bushco apologized to the King of Jordon.
Let’s not leave anything out now.
Technically, anyone who “sees” Bushco’s “apology” is hallucinating.
The nightly news had tape showing Bush making the claim that he had apologized to the king of Jordan. However, if that apology occured, it was during an untaped private meeting. As the WMD evidence debacle taught us, it is unwise to believe anything Bush tells us without also seeing some concrete physical evidence that things really are as the president describes.
I misread your post and I didn’t believe that Bush apologized to the King of Jordan for the torture of Jordanians.
He didn’t. He apologized to the king of Jordan for torturing Iraqi’s.
Explain that from our great misleader.