I second that emotion.
I see it was over a year ago: can they take guns into the state fair? Whatever became of that?
I second that emotion.
I see it was over a year ago: can they take guns into the state fair? Whatever became of that?
Look, some of us live here. We are appalled at what is going on. We are dismayed that our state gummint needs to be fucked. We agree that it does. But we hate that it does. Politics isn’t 100% of Texas or of life.
I would support changing the title to “Fuck Texas Politics/Government.” Otherwise, just leave it alone.
I appreciate your sentiment.
But you, as a Texas resident, could have answered my second question, too.
Would you also add “…and the majority of voters that put them in charge”?

New and returning firearm protocols at the State Fair of Texas come amid scrutiny from elected officials.
So, still banned from the state fair.
ETA:
... read more
Est. reading time: 11 minutes
Weapons Policy
As a private not-for-profit organization, the State Fair of Texas prohibits fairgoers from carrying all firearms, knives (other than small pocketknives), clubs, explosive devices, ammunition, chemical dispensing devices, replicas or hoaxes, or other weapons of any kind. This includes holders of a License to Carry, Constitutional Carry, Concealed Carry, and the Open Carry of firearms anywhere on the fairgrounds, including Cotton Bowl Stadium. This policy does not apply to current peace officers or qualified retired peace officers in accordance with state law. Peace officers’ credentials will be verified by Dallas Police Department officers during the screening process.
So, still banned from the state fair.
Thanks, and good for the Fair.
Would you also add “…and the majority of voters that put them in charge”?
I have family and friends living in Texas, all safely on the blue side of the spectrum, and they agree 100% that there a a ton of people that deserve your hate. But majority is probably wrong. Those of us living outside the state can’t readily grasp how horribly the game is stacked - the recent gerrymanding is just the cherry on top of one of those “challenge” giga-Sundae’s of hacks and corruption. Arguably, Texas Republicans were breaking the law with Trump-like immunity and disregard for the law long decades before Trump took it mainstream.
If the state government hadn’t stacked the deck cold and hard for decades, challenges could be brought. But prior (D) administrations lacked the majority, influence, or political currency to step in. And I won’t say more about how much our ever-more-political SCOTUS has given them cover either.
While I’d sort of agree that outright majority is iffy, don’t forget Abbott, Cornyn, Cruz, among others, hold positions elected statewide and all won by decent, though perhaps not spectacular, majorities the last time each of them ran.
But that last part is probably telling. In a ‘deeply’ red state, getting more than 55% of the vote is still damned difficult for these clowns. And most of those voters aren’t exact “study the issues” types. More like “vote the same party I have for the last 30 years” types.
So, yes, majority but not as solid of a majority as the stereotype.
the recent gerrymanding is just the cherry on top of one of those “challenge” giga-Sundae’s of hacks and corruption
There has to be a point where gerrymandering blows up in their faces. I mean, if you have, say, five districts to work with and draw lines so three or even four of them barely get majorities for your side and the other side’s voters get stuffed into the one(s) remaining then piss people off to the point where 60+% of everyone won’t vote for you, those bare minorities vanish.
My understanding is that you pick a few “through away districts” that can’t be bothered with (big Metro areas for example) to which you glom on any other loosely (very!) connected territories, and then assemble otherwise however you want. None of this requires being “fair” in anyway. If you want to give, say, the DFW metro plex one token vote (plus any liberal areas around) and another to Austin (ditto) and then arrange for everything else to be red or close to it, you have the powerless opposition entirely sidelined when the SCOTUS says “hands off”.
So you could have (easy but false numbers) 10 million people. 4 million are liberal or lean that way, 6 are conservative. But you decided you have 20 districts. You put a million libs in District 1, another million in 2, and divide up the other remaining 18 districts with the last 2 million libs against 6 million conservatives, and the conservatives win every single time, leaving the two districts outnumbered in representation 9-to-1.
VAST, I say, VAST oversimplification of course. For example even blue metro areas are at best still blue-ish purple), and there are some liberals outside the metro, so the division isn’t nearly as easy as the example above.
But it’s even worse for the whole TX voting BS - each county only gets ONE voting area. So a county of 10,000 people gets one, and a county with a metro city of millions ALSO only gets one. Who is going to have an easier time voting?
It’s BS, corruption, dishonesty or what have you all the way down.
Just when you think it couldn’t get any more stupid there.
If 8% of the wall costs $3B, then 100% of the wall would cost at least 12x that much. IOW, $36B. Not the $20B they’re claiming.
What is the exchange rate between the US Dollar and the Republic of Texas’ Texas Dollar?
Just when you think it couldn’t get any more stupid there.
Texas files Tylenol lawsuit, taking cues from Trump and RFK Jr.
So they have to prove in court that Tylenol causes autism (and that they know it)? Go for it, I suppose. I look forward to the countersuit.
So they have to prove in court that Tylenol causes autism (and that they know it)?
No, they don’t have to prove in court that Tylenol causes autism. They just have to file a lawsuit, so that people know that they’re “doing things to protect people”. It’s also advertising for the conspiracy theory, and serves as slander against Johnson & Johnson.
The same way that Trump doesn’t have to prove anything for these bullshit indictments against people with zero evidence. The indictment itself is the end goal.

Abbott vowing to gut funding for schools
Gov. Greg Abbott won his campaign to give taxpayer money to private schools. Now he’s promising to
starve public schools of the funds they need to compete.The governor promised to push through laws to make it almost impossible for school districts to
raise taxes. In announcing his run for a record fourth term, he also said voters should have the
power to reduce or eliminate school funding entirely. Abbott is aligning himself with the most reactionary members of his Republican Party. For decades, fringe conservatives have wanted to end government-run schools and send every child to private institutions run by clerics or ideologues under the banner of parental choice.…
Texas already ranks 47th in the nation in public school funding and pays teachers $10,000 less a year than the national average. No surprise then that Texas students trail the nation in reading and math scores, according to the Nation’s Report Card, a nonprofit that analyzes testing data.
…
But wait! Texas also ranks LAST in healthcare coverage for children. You go, Greg! Let’s make sure the next generation of Texans is ignorant, illiterate, and sick. ![]()
Yeah, I live here.
Let’s make sure the next generation of Texans is ignorant, illiterate, and sick.
But the survivors will be sooooo much tougher!
Lately on YouTube there has been a flurry of ads touting how Texas is a great place to visit.
Can’t imagine why.
In a similar vein, now in the Valley is when our winter visitors start arriving. It will be interesting to see if/how many of the ones from Canada don’t come.
Lately on YouTube there has been a flurry of ads touting how Texas is a great place to visit.
…But you wouldn’t want to live there!
![]()