[QUOTE=Equipoise]
:eek: Oh my, no. Did you actually SEE Casino Royale? All the way through? If you did, then I’ll accept your (sadly, wrong-headed) opinion, but if you didn’t, please get back to me after you’ve seen it. The trailers and still images did NOT reflect how charismatic and hot Daniel Craig was in that role. He was perfect.
[/QUOTE]
I agree 100%. Daniel Craig was *yummy *as Bond.
I think Queen Latifah is one of the most beautiful women in Hollywood, and she’s only gotten more beautiful through the years. I’ve never seen a woman with a more perfect set of cheekbones in my life.
[QUOTE=SkipMagic]
Actually, she already did–right after I asked her to do so.
[/QUOTE]
Sorry. It was late. I was tired. I thought I’d read to the end of the thread and realized there was another page too late to edit my post. I also didn’t think it was heinous enough to be reportable.
[QUOTE=DeadlyAccurate]
I think Queen Latifah is one of the most beautiful women in Hollywood, and she’s only gotten more beautiful through the years. I’ve never seen a woman with a more perfect set of cheekbones in my life.
[/QUOTE]
Not only is she hot (though she’s more ‘big’ than ‘fat’), she’s smart as a whip.
[QUOTE=DiosaBellissima]
Well, I’m an immature, desperate, ugly, 21 year old. So, I suppose I get a pass, right? Seeing as she isn’t half my age, you know.
I mean, seeing as Rumer is within my age group and has probably done more wild and crazy crap than I could ever dream of, right? After all, she parties with Lohan, so she’s certainly no angel.
And WhyNot, I have a big stupid Italian nose and while people have commented on it in the past, I’ve learned to embrace my stupid Italian nose and love it. I wouldn’t fault someone for pointing out my nose though, it’s very Italian. It’s part of me and that makes it cool to me, maybe not everyone else.
[/QUOTE]
Diosa, while I’ve never really delved into your profile, I’d have never guessed you to be so young. Wow! You’re always right in there with us older ladies and certainly hold your own. You go girl!!
[QUOTE=Cat Fight]
Not only is she hot (though she’s more ‘big’ than ‘fat’), she’s smart as a whip.
[/QUOTE]
Is it too hijacky to ask what the difference between big and fat is? It is because she still has a distinct waist and hips? 'Cause in the same kind of foundationwear she wears (I must find the name of her corsetmaker, 'cause yowza! She fine!), my body is pretty close to identical in size and shape - at least before her breast reduction. I’d be thrilled to find I’m “more ‘big’ than ‘fat’!”
[QUOTE=WhyNot]
Is it too hijacky to ask what the difference between big and fat is? It is because she still has a distinct waist and hips? 'Cause in the same kind of foundationwear she wears (I must find the name of her corsetmaker, 'cause yowza! She fine!), my body is pretty close to identical in size and shape - at least before her breast reduction. I’d be thrilled to find I’m “more ‘big’ than ‘fat’!”
[/QUOTE]
I think that in most people’s mind’s the difference between “big” and “fat” is in the firmness of the flesh, and how the weight is distributed, especially around the waist and the face. Miss Dana don’t jiggle (at least not in her fabulous foundation garments, and she keeps her arms in bare-able shape), and she has only the one chin God intended. I NEVER look at her and think “fat”, but there are lots of women smaller than she is who don’t carry it nearly as well.
Late to the party, but OK:
I think that is one pretty girl - aspects of those two interchangeable-looking singers of a couple years ago, Vanessa Carlton and Michelle Branch. With a little Tilly genes thrown in around the eyes.
