Like many of you, I’m assuming he is going to explain, mea culpa style, why he was such a hypocrite on the drug war.
Or, not?
Many US talking-head type conservatives have lined up to defend Rush as the intellectual leader of the modern conservative movement. Which, I guess, makes modern conservatism not unlike the 1960s counterculture movement led by Jimi Hendrix or Keith Richards.
Maybe he’ll give Donovan McNabb props for his stellar performance yesterday and his team’s five straight victories. That’s more likely. Still unlikely though.
Doesn’t seem to me he admits to being a hypocrite. That’s a damn shame. I am pretty sure at one point, before he started popping the pills, he would have asserted that the vile person doing the same thing he ended up doing needed to be incarcerated.
I would define as: Ann Coulter, Michael Reagan, Sean Hannity, Joe Scarborough*… I’ve heard Coulter, Scarborough and some others defend Rush as being different than other drug addicts because, well, “he had pain” in a phrase – then go on to explain how important he is to the whole conservative movement. Roll your eyes until you pull a muscle.
He is important from a “every day for three hours” standpoint. For years there wasn’t anything quite like Rush, then there was. Like Elvis, only moreso.
*R, FL / talking head – I think I debated against that guy a couple times in HS. Weird. I just checked his bio and some other stuff. I really think I did now. You know you are getting old when… :eek:
You forgot Mike Savage, who tonight declared that “Captain and Commander”(sic) was just unbelievably bad because it was a NAMBLA fantasy world where people (read: fag screenwriters) actually play instruments and sing which, according to him, is historically inaccurate. I assume that he must think that singing and instrument playing among soldiers and officers and intellectuals was invented by Broadway, because that was his point over and over again, among other races and nationalities that he thought should eat shit and die.
Main Entry: hy·poc·ri·sy
Pronunciation: hi-'pä-kr&-sE also hI-
Function: noun
1 : a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not; especially : the false assumption of an appearance of virtue or religion
2 : an act or instance of hypocrisy
I can’t believe he actually said he wasn’t guilty of hypocrisy and then went on to give a near perfect textbook definition of it
If Rush never claimed he wasn’t on drugs it’s not technically hypocrisy (what are the chance he’d ever have to?). Of course there’s always room for pointless semantic debate.