Unless it’s a Russian sleight of hand it means the Ukrainian government has survived this invasion (at least for now). This is a major victory for Ukraine, though A LOT of fighting still to do. If Russia has a victorious phase two then they might change their mind about challenging Zelenskyy.
Of course Ukraine will obviously still battle for Dombas.
I also hope this means the end of the nightmare in Mariupol.
I’d expect the Russians to keep shelling Ukrainian cities and trying to capture Mariupol, but framing their retreats as “tactical withdrawals having completed their objectives”.
Well the Russians are clearly managing expectations at home. They know they cannot win without unacceptable losses. So it seems pretty clear that they are looking for a consolation prize that they can try to claim as a victory. At this point I reckon Putin is just trying to save his job (and maybe his life). A military defeat or a bogged down campaign and he surely can’t survive.
Just because they say that doesn’t mean they’re not still planning on encircling and destroying Kyiv. Nothing the Kremlin says is worth the electrons it took to display the words on your screen.
I’d agree that it indicates that the Russians have now accepted that they can’t conquer the whole of Ukraine and that they’ve recalibrated to just conquering the Donbas. Holding other Ukrainian territory would therefore be as capital in any peace negotiations, although it’s possible they might try and claim something in the south.
If Crimea’s population is heavily pro-Russia, is it really worth it for Ukraine to try to take it back? It would be a never-ending headache for the Ukrainian government.
Lavrov and Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova claimed that Ukraine is constantly changing its position under manipulation from the United States.
The Russians simply can NOT wrap their heads around the notion that Ukraine is its own country and not a puppet, can they?
Do we actually know if Crimea is pro or anti Russia at this point? I’m sure as hell not taking the Kremlin’s word on that.
So what happened to the population of Crimea after the annexation? Russian loyalists were moved in and people who had been there for generations were encouraged to move out. Many of those were Crimean Tartars who had been expelled from the territory by Stalin and survived the ordeal, managed to return in 1989.
Russian propaganda claims Crimea to be rightfully the possession of Russia. There are Russian speakers there, so this must surely be the case. I don’t doubt they would treat the Baltic states, who suffered similar deportations during Stalins time, in the same manner.
I guess the temptation is for many other larger countries is to simply regard such territories not as nations with a discrete national identity, language and ethnicity, but convenient bargaining chips. A bone to toss to the hungry Russian bear?
Apparently many of the Crimean Tatars moved to Kyiv and they run some of the better restaurants. Similar, in that respect, to the Georgians in Moscow…until that other invasion turn things sour.
This explains the tank bunkers and minefields that appeared outside Keiv last week. The Russians will primarily focus on Donbas region. But, the troops outside Keiv aren’t leaving. They’re fortifying their position.
That’s completely unacceptable for Ukraine. They’ll be under threat for years and they’ll still lose access to the Azov Sea ports.
I’m not sure Ukraine has the offensive capability to retake their territory. They need more long range missiles and air power.
Russia will, if allowed to stay there, simply restart their offensive as soon as they resupply and come up with a better plan. They will come up with a bullshit excuse and attack as soon as possible.