I’m of the opinion that it’s still best to listen to Fleming. “Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.”
Make it clear this was unacceptable, move more assets into Poland and Eastern Europe, and keep supplying Ukraine. No need to really do more unless it happens again.
Perhaps his advisors are telling him that NATO is weak, and will capitulate easily if challenged. Because they know that’s what he wants to hear.
Perhaps he’s just testing the boundaries. Just how much he can get away with. How about sending missiles to an airport in Poland next? Electrical infrastructure next? Just where is NATO’s line?
I generally agree, but these are Russian weapons, so it’s possible someone sold one of the guidance chips for a pack of cigarettes and caused them to go off course.
I just saw a tweet showing a part of a motor of a SAM rocket (with long numbers as model type) that was identical to the debris seen in poland … but the tweet disappeared:
also:
so there might be a chance that this is a S-300 missile (used by both Ukr and RU forces) …
Decent chance it’s an accident, either Russia’s or Ukraine’s. Obviously Ukraine is going to blame Russia, regardless of the truth, they’ll want to exploit this to get more supplies at the minimum.
Russia is terrified of NATO getting involved. They go out of their way to avoid antagonizing them. I don’t put any stock in the “maybe Putin is just dumb as shit and all his advisors are lying to him so he bombed a farm!”
This is almost certainly accidental, but still think it results in increased Western weaponry to Ukraine.
Wikipedia says that Ukraine used to have Kh-55s, but scrapped about 487 of them and returned about 587 to Russia. Current operators are Iran, China, and Russia.