Sarah Palin attacks the President on foreign soil

Shhhh! You’re ruining my stealth plan to get him into power while all the SDMB Lefties are busy poking fun at Sarah, our best agent of diversion!
Oh! I wrote that where everyone can see it! Didn’t I?

When have conservatives NOT been full of shit?

Btw, Dio, thanks for the breitbart link. It also had a link to this delightful little public school activity of praise for the Messiah.

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/09/24/shock-video-school-kids-taught-to-praise-obama/

You know, this really does not help quash the “Messiah/AntiChrist” talk.

I can’t understand a word those kids are saying. When do they call him their “Messiah?” What are their exact words?

As the Morality Czar said, he’s not the Messiah, he’s a very naughty boyar.

Feel free to begin practicing what you preach at any time.

I always have. Perhaps you’re confusing me with someone else.

I agree that DtC is fairly intolerant compared to the average Doper, but not of dissent. You can be grossly intolerant of other peoples views without wanting to squelch them, and absent evidence I haven’t seen that from DtC.

Oh, guys, it’s so mean to rain on JJM’s parade with all these irritating facts when he’s settling so comfortably on his cross up there.

Unclear to me that she “attacks the President” in her speech.

She spoke from notes for 90 minutes. She was reported to have gotten 300K for the appearance. That is a lot of money.

Well, I’m convinced.

About what, I’m not sure.

Weren’t the Dixie Chicks also at a private event? They were in concert as far as I know, not performing a public service. Was them saying ‘we are ashamed the president is from Texas’ recorded by the press? I thought it was brought to our attention by eyewitness’s just as Palin’s remarks.

300 K goes to motive and it is a lot of money for a person who is not an expert on anything I wouldn’t pay a quarter for a Palin speech, if she gave it naked.
Just info, I am sure you could see there was no argument there.

Ok, the AP wires saw nothing and neither did the New York Times.

What about the foreign press? Here’s the lead from The Standard (Hong Kong)

The article was written by the wire service Agence France-Presse.

I think Palin can say what she wants. Can we all agree that the nutjobs who jumped all over the Dixie Chicks but stayed silent in this case are BS purveyors whose views should be dismissed? I’m thinking of Limbaugh, Hannity and O’Reilly. Incidentally, I searched the internet and I couldn’t find anything by David Brooks or George Will on the Dixie Chicks. Maybe the allegedly serious conservative commentators dodged that controversy, just as they demure when asked about intelligent design. This is odd since the meme that “Partisanship stops at the waters edge” touches on substantive issues.

We all know that conservatives are full of shit --sorry “Too clever by half”-- but I’m seeing emerging evidence that the more serious conservative pundits are weasels as well. I wasn’t aware of that.

Since when was she disgraced? I know many here have a pretty low opinion of her, but she hasn’t been convicted of anything, has she? She’s not been caught in bed with someone other than her husband, has she?

THAT is wonderful!

Since she quit her job halfway through her first term.

That’s a pretty generous use of “disgrace.”

Of course, I think she was disgraced by not being able to name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v. Wade, so perhaps I’m not the bets authority either.

When she started giving interviews.