Sarah Palin smoked weed, did blow and banged Glen Rice

I just need to comment on this - I feel like the use of an apostrophe that way, as in “TEXAN’S” - is almost always a sign that the individual making the mistake is a right-wing Teabagger blowhard. I see this usage all the time and it’s so often correlated with the expression of some right-wing sentiment.

“Obama wants to take away our gun’s.”

Etc.

I never see this incorrect apostrophe coming from left-wing blowhards - it’s always the right-wing ones.

And freely admitted it. You only know about it because he told you, so who cares?

Not true. The charges were dropped after the accuser failed a polygraph. There was no lawsuit.

The latter allegation is false. it’s true that he fathered a child out of wedlock, but there’s no reason for you to call an innocent baby a “bastard.” Don’t forget that Jesus was conceived out of wedlock.

True. So what?

Total non-sequitur. What does your list of tu quoques have to do with whatever Sarah Palin did?

For the record, I don’t think anybody here is even saying they think she did anything wrong (except maybe for cheating on her husband). We’re just having a laugh at what a party animal she was. I wonder if she ever practiced witchcraft.

Huge difference.

Seriously? Did you read the review on those other places?

The first listed definition of “bastard” means you’re wrong again.

This thread was a lot more fun when it was about Sarah Palin catching an STD from blowing a weed dealer for rice, or something like that.

For Christ’s sake, I know the literal definition of the word. I didn’t say it was the wrong definition. I was saying it was gratuitously rude. You can’t possibly honestly think you really just scored some kind of point here.

Now I keep hearing Sarah, you ignorant slut in Dan Akroyd’s voice :smiley:

Yeah, and you believed every word from the retarded Levi Johnston… because you WANTED to.

Joe McGinniss is NOT a reputable reporter. He’s a sleazoid “true crime” reporter with a long history of plagiarism.

Does that mean EVERYTHING he writes is false? Of course not- it just means that he’s taken EVERY piece of gossip he’s heard and thrown it into a book, knowing there are plenty of obsessive liberals who are eager to shell out money to read about Sarah Palin (who isn’t President, who isn’t Vice President, who isn’t holding ANY public office of ANY kind).

Like you.

“Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools talk because they have to say something.”–Plato

Not a word has been proven false.

Rest assured, few of us will think any the less of her because of this.

I don’t even think it’s anything bad.

He’ll, doesn’t stuff like this benefit Sarah anyway??

SHIT, I hate her, but she uses the “lamestream media” to gain attention all the time. She wants attention, she gets it, I’ll give her that. Ugh.

I’d father have shit on Bachmann/Perry/Romney (I keep calling him Rooney :D), but this is going to really be entertaining watching Fox News on this. :wink:

Today on “sentences Czarcasm never thought he would type”…

Ya just made me shoot Citron and tonic out my nose. :smiley:

You’ll have to remain the ‘expert’ on that. I don’t pay attention to either one but if that’s your cup of tea, so be it. To an unbiased, casual observer though, even the bare, indisputable facts of the story don’t pass the smell test.

I do though know something about Wasilla, having lived in Alaska for 5 years. I ran 8 man crews over much of the state, including Wasilla and much more of the Matanuska Valley, and don’t recall ever having trouble finding plenty of rooms for all my guys. The notion that the only place available was next door to the Palins is, even for someone with your long, ad nauseum history of ridiculous assertions, patently absurd.

The fuckin’ Dio Show all over again… be sure to visit the gift shop before you leave.

Especially if there’s a risk of seeing Santorum.

This thread is a more deeply flawed trainwreck than Palin, so I’ll just stick to not being a supporter of hers for silly reasons like not agreeing with her stated viewpoints.

Back off on the personal commentary. This kind of remark belongs in the Pit and is not appropriate in any of the other forums.