SarahWitch, the premier expert on American law.

[Muffin]

@SarahWitch

I’m the premier expert on American law

Based on your ramblings in GD and your refusing to put forward your bona fides in a forum in which you are expected to back up your assertions, clearly you are not the premier expert on American law despite holding yourself out as such.

Your misrepresentation leaves you as either a self-deluded nutter, or a troll, or some combination thereof.

Which is it?

[Roderick_Femm]

The persistent and obstinate refusal to provide straight answers to straightforward questions leaves little doubt in my mind. I go for self-deluded troll.

[BigT]

She’s already been mentioned in the troll thread.

And I don’t think she’s deluded. That’s way too high a view of oneself.

[Morgenstern]

She already gave her credentials. You must have missed it.

They are, “you shall know me by my works.”

Be nice to her until she turns all the water to wine, they we can mock her.
Thank you.

[Guinastasia]

Susannan’s slightly more coherant little sister?

[Moriarty]

She’ll be banned within the hour.

[Sage_Rat]

Oh wow, I thought the thread title was just going to be a joke when I clicked it.

Actual quote! :eek:

[Spoons]

@Morgenstern

She already gave her credentials. You must have missed it.

They are, “you shall know me by my works.”

I’m reminded of a long-ago poster who used to like to say, “My post is my cite.”

[asahi]

Sarahwitch = Troll-a-saurus Rex.

[silenus]

Maybe, but Aldebaran was usually coherent. SarahWitch isn’t.

[Grrr]

Is this one of the “lawyers” Shags has claimed to of dated?

[billfish678]

@Morgenstern

She already gave her credentials. You must have missed it.

They are, “you shall know me by my works.”

Be nice to her until she turns all the water to wine, they we can mock her.
Thank you.

Hey, anybody that is turning water into wine ain’t getting any mocking from me…some sucking up? hell yeah…mocking? no…

[Moriarty]

@Grrr

Is this one of the “lawyers” Shags has claimed to of dated?

Ha! Maybe the recent spate of spammers and lunatics can be attributed to his dating escapades. He must link to here on his dating profile.

[Itself]

@Muffin

Your misrepresentation leaves you as either a self-deluded nutter, or a troll, or some combination thereof.

Which is it?

Why not both? In any case, she’ll be gone by the end of the week, whether from being banned or stalking off in a huff after the liberals fail to acknowledge her very special talents.

[Sterling_Archer]

@SarahWitch

If you want to write fiction, this isn’t the place for it. It was about one thing, and ONLY one thing: national sovereignty.
That’s was the CSA states’ sole legal basis for secession, and the federal government’s legal basis for* invasion*; that is a simple fact, and if you deny this you are WRONG

Pure racist revisionism right there. I think we’ve seen enough.

[JRDelirious]

@Itself

Why not both? In any case, she’ll be gone by the end of the week, whether from being banned or stalking off in a huff after the liberals fail to acknowledge her very special talents.

Well she has a talent for uniting Doper Minds from right and left into a rare consensus along the lines of WTF :dubious: oh please :rolleyes:

[Ann_Hedonia]

SarahWitch…SarahWitch… it all sounds so familiar…the incoherency, the batshit ideas about how government should work…SarahWitch…do you think she might be from Alaska? Maybe a former high level elected official there? And the undisputed queen of WTF? That would explain so much.

The quote below is from the other thread, I found it but I’m not sure it was linked to
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=825660
She appears towards the end of page 3.

But I was struck by her habit of highlighting random words with italics. It reminded me of how I punch up random words when I’m singing McArthur Park (Richard Harris version) at the karaoke bar. So I started to sing the below post to the tune of McArthur Park. It fit better than I expected although I had to replace Oh No Oh No with…All About…All About…pure bunk…pure bunk…and. ie NONE ie NONE.

It’s a long song. It was a long post.

@SarahWitch

This is quibbling. The sole issue is national sovereignty of a individual nation-states, which the USA does not have over its member-states-- as the federal government claims. Nothing else matters.

You’re confusing centralization, with national sovereignty– which the CSA states never ceded to the CSA Union, nor did did the CSA allege; indeed, that was the sole issue between the two Union, i.e. the USA claimed that the states formed a single nation-state, while the CSA states claimed they were always separate nation-states.

That’s what it was ALL about. If the North admitted that the truth, that the states were sovereign nation-states, then there could have been no war; however charlatans fabricated many arguments to deny this fact under color of law, from Jackson to Lincoln.

Separate nation-states can form federal republics which can be as centralized as they please, without forfeiting their status as separate nation-states; this can only be lost if they expressly manifest such an act; and the American states never did that.

That’s the confusion which plagues most people today, in claiming that USA’s common military, currency, whatever, made the states into a single nation-state, by implication… when all that is pure bunk. It doesn’t work that way, for reasons I just stated.

The Euro, the UN army, etc. did not make those nation-states into a single nation-state-- but Hitler, Hussein and Hirohito * claimed* this in their various conquests, with the same legal validity as Lincoln-- i.e. none. Again, it can only happen by* express action,* since a nation-state is its own supreme ruler by law, in terms of judging legal intent. Thus, nothing can be *left *to judgment in such a treaty which joins two or more nation-states as a single one.

[buckgully]

I’ve got Tree Fiddy on “The Fourteenth Amendment was never ratified.”

[eschereal]

@Ann_Hedonia

It’s a long song. It was a long post.

Further down in the thread, she says

@SarahWitch

Oh, no. I expressly mentioned that the *People *of each state were the sovereign national authority therein; because they are.
State governments were actually below the federal government in the Constitution’s delegated chain-of-command, but both were completely subordinate to the People of the individual nation-state.
FACT.
Hope this clears things up.

So, huh?

[Aspenglow]

People; who; overuse; semi-colons; as; a; way; of; attempting; to; project; intelligence; always; crack; me; up.