Yes. Are you aware that being gay and being a pedophile are two different, unrelated things? Because you aren’t coming across as if you understand that.
I did limit my response to something you actually said. You offered no qualifiers attached to “women and gay men” or to “man or lesbians”. Your reference to “women and gay men” was in defining “adults that are attracted to boys”. Really, you wrote it, and it’s right there above to read in it’s entirety. If you didn’t mean “all women and gay men are adults that are attracted to boys”, you wrote very poorly.
Cite? Got a cite? Because Miller had a cite, and it says you’re wrong.
You aren’t looking good in this exchange, that’s for sure.
No, I just might have, evidently, given readers too much credit. Do you think that if I wanted to make the extreme, absolute claim of “all”, I might have included that word? This is a very childish semantic game your playing and I have no interest in playing. Go apply this level of analysis and reasonableness to Trump’s statements, because I’m sure that you’re of the mind that he meant that every single Mexican was a rapist. :rolleyes: But tell me, does that mean every single Mexican ever born? You get right on that, okay?
First, I said I do NOT doubt the veracity of the claim made in Miller’s cite. Second, you’re wrong here because Miller’s cite does not define “children” and makes no distinction between pedophilia and ebophilia.
Ha. If you think I give any weight to your estimation of how I might look at any time, you are very, very sadly mistaken. But if you think you’re winning something, good for you. Maybe you should pat yourself on the back and put a gold star on your lapel.
Nah, that’s a fair point. I was thinking of Boy Scouts as primarily an organization for younger kids, but I realized I was confusing it with Cub Scouts. There are sixteen and seventeen year old Boy Scouts, and lusting after a sixteen year old doesn’t make you a pedo. Skeevy as fuck, but not a pedo.
I still say that Walker was deliberately playing to overt homophobes with that speech, though. Can’t prove it, obviously, and I’m definitely influenced by my overall impression of Walker as a human-shaped turd in a three piece suit, but I have very little doubt what he was trying to do there.
You wrote the words, I just read them. If you didn’t mean “all”, you should have offered that qualifier. You didn’t, and it’s reasonable to assume you meant “all women and gay men”; in fact, as I showed, it’s implied. If you don’t want to be misunderstood, improve your communication skills.
Don’t get too nervous about a Walker presidency, fellow commie-pinko-Wobbly-fellow travelers. (secret hand signal)
America will NEVER accept a President with a wandering eye. In an age where pop singers, concert violinists, and even novelists have to be physically beautiful, we will never see another ugly or “funny-looking” chief executive. The last total beast to win the office was Nixon.
Also, America will never accept a First Lady called “Tonette.”
Yes, well there’s the little problem that the Supreme Court justices themselves have benefited substantially from the campaign tactics they were being asked to rule against:
Funny thing…Ted Cruz says he gets messages from God every day.
Sarah Palin said God wanted her to run for office.
GWB said God wanted him to go to war.
Rick Santorum, Walker, and who knows how many others were/are all convinced that they are on a mission from God.
I wish someone would really dig in with the questions at one of these debates or panels:
If God wants all of you to run, is he just testing you and sorting you out?
Maybe God only wants one of you to run and the others just got their wires crossed. Is that it? So who is the chosen one?
Maybe God doesn’t really want any of you to run, but you think so because you’re delusional. Possible?
