But the author didn’t use the word “may”, so NDD is still free to treat it as an undisputed fact for as long as it’s convenient to his case for him to do so.
BTW, anybody want to start a pool on when this “Stupid NDD Argument Of The Day” thread will catch up to the postcount of “Stupid Republican Idea Of The Day”?
So saith he who drags The Ten Thousand Year Pot-Cracking into every thread.
And then they…forgot how to forge iron? For centuries? I thought they were supposed to be uber smartz?
But sure, if you cherry pick, ad hoc and true scotsman enough you’ll find everything fits your conclusions.
Other people may find it comical when your own cites say that SS Africa was one of the first places to forge iron and refine it to high quality carbon steel, but no problem: you can blank them out like everything else.
I guess that the assertions made in L’Effroyable imposture must not be at all “dubious”, since that book was translated into English (under the title of 9/11: The Big Lie).
Is there some specific line between “identify by geographic location only” (west of the line) and “trace back mass migrations” (east of the line)? How do you deal with people who migrate across the line?
Back then, they had an average IQ of 54.
You were more fun to play with back when you were pretending to think that you had an actual, reasonable point to make. Now you’re just boring, repeating the same old dumbshittery in every post.
Hmm.
Has anyone else noticed that whenever someone asks a question which demolishes NDD’s entire point of view, it gets completely ignored, while arguments that really shouldn’t be necessary to begin with get addressed extensively?
I’ve volunteered at places with individuals with Down’s Syndrome. They’d never use the term “anti-racist” as an epithet.
What matters is that the ancestors of the Japanese left the stone age much much earlier than the ancestors of American Negroes.
That is why the Japanese responded peacefully to the tsunami of 2011, while blacks took advantage of the breakdown of law and order during the 2005 Katrina Hurricane to engage in an orgy of looting.
<cough> rape of Nanking <cough cough>
Or has the Japanese Race[sup]TM[/sup]as a whole evolved that much in 60 years.
Yes, yes we know…black people loot, while white peoplefind…
And then the Japanese “regressed” back to the “stone age”, while sub-Saharan Africans raced ahead of them.
And you still haven’t answered my question about Bamileke and Kikuyu.
Also, apparently, white people don’t riot over food but ice hockey. No doubt this is because such a high-minded intellectual pursuit naturally engenders great emotion among spectators such that impasses can only be resolved physically. No need for a natural disaster to create extreme conditions (or false news stories) when there’s ice hockey about.
Also, as NDD would no doubt point out, dog breeders have worked wonders in 4 generations, so obviously, we can convert the genetics of an entire population (including the non-trivial number of people who have already been born) in 2 or 3 generations.
But maybe there’s something to NDD’s assertions. I’m one of those “Orientals”, and I like to think (and I think I can get some backing on this from the board) that I could kick his ass in a scientific debate any given day of the week, with a Saturday encore. I think a fifth of scotch would be a good handicap for me, too.
When did that happen?
They didn’t start working with metal until about 100 BC.
And I’m going to keep asking about the Bamileke and Kikuyu until you address it.
I got a perfect score on this test:
But then again, so did ten percent of those who took it.
If you are so scientifically literate, why can’t you explain the persistence of significant racial differences without attributing much of the differences to genetics?
You may feel brave when you are part of a screaming mob of the politically correct. You would not be impressive before an audience of those who were unbiased, and trying to decide the importance of genetics in human affairs.
But the “racial differences” part doesn’t make sense at all. How could such a huge genetic variety as sub-Saharan Africa all have the “dumb genes”, when many of these populations are more closely related to non African populations (without the “dumb genes”) than to other “Negro” populations?
And do you consider Bamileke and Kikuyu the same race?
The people using the metal had immigrated from the mainland of Asia where they had been using it for much longer.
If the question is important ask it again. I have more important things to do than read every insult directed against me, as well as every rhetorical question, every cliche, and every logical fallacy.
That test is incredibly easy. I think a fifth grader who paid attention in class should be able to ace it with very little effort.