Of which, there does not exist enough adequate, direct genetic evidence to uphold this opinion.
Of course, you’re welcome to have it, but don’t assert it to be fact or even the most plausible hypothesis (but an admitted possibility, which will have to acquire substantial and rigid genetic evidence to even crystalize it into a theory).
It’s been shown that cultural and environmental factors affect intelligence over a gradient from infancy to adulthood.
Genetics, of course, play a part in everything we are. But the culmination of these genes, as manifested as our cognition and intelligence, is extremely complicated on the genetic level, not even counting biological or environmental factors which can both impart a profound effect on intelligence. To even compare them to the traits of height, eye or skin color, or other more simple phenotypic traits is to completely misunderstand the immensity of the issue of intelligence.
Intelligence has some measurable facets, and a vast amount of abstract and fluid undercurrents that aren’t yet fully understood. So, before even using IQ scores and g-factors as evidence of some racial intelligence/achievement gap, we’re not even sure if these tests are comprehensive enough to measure the range of all forms and manifestations of human intelligence.
And most of all: It has not yet been defined what the definition for “Negro,” Oriental," or “Caucasian” are. So without this simple starting point, there’s absolutely zero foundation to even begin an honest inquiry in the matter.
Good point. I rescind my question that he was, if he acknowledged it at all, only going to answer with the same lame shit he’s dribbled out a few dozen times already.
I note that you continue to maintain that using bad words on the internet is bad but have had no qualms suggesting that eugenics and forced labor are acceptable.
Do you dudes all get Purina Troll Chow by the hundred-fucking pound bags or something? This is exactly what these asshole trolls want, why are you giving it to them?
