Not trying to shout you down, it’s just that in my eyes, you’re a pigfucker. Sorry.
Oh, and I am a scoundrel, no argument.
Scoundrel? Scoundrel? I like the sound of that.
I mouse-overed. :o
I’ve seen you display none of these attributes. There is nothing civil about saying other people on the SDMB should be enslaved, nor is there literacy demonstrated in consistently relying on a small number of discredited sources to support your position while being obviously incapable of understanding sources based on actual science. Attributing “erudition” to yourself is pretty rich, to say the least.
I agree with this. I’m pretty confident that one can cherry pick a few countries or political subdivisions to generate a negative correlation between blacks and crime. Just like you can find a few smokers who live long, healthy lives.
But overall, it seems pretty clear that black = greater incidence of crime and smoking = greater chance lung cancer.
I forgot to mention:
You mean like this?
Doubt they found many Belaya Gvardiya in South Africa though…
Wait, Voldemort is behind the racial achievement gap?
I am only in favor of forced labor for criminals. Severe punishment is the only way to reduce the crime rate. My support for eugenics is restricted to opposing Aid to Families with Dependent Children. That is a respectable stand that is shared by Charles Murray.
I continue to be told that my cites do not support my arguments. What I have documented is that the races differ significantly and durably in average ability levels, and behavior. Even if this is not due to genetic differences, as I believe it it, it is a significant fact that has legitimate policy implications.
Ah! We make progress.
Since your cites were made in support of an argument about genetic differences, it’s good to see an acknowledgement of their weaknesses in this respect. The policy implications of the achievement gaps irrespective of cause are a different argument altogether.
“I have demonstrated in my posts that there is a strong correlation between the racial composition of a country and the murder rate. I have also pointed out that the correlation is not one to one.”
You have also amply demonstrated no understanding of the nuances between correlation and causation…:rolleyes:
You shouldn’t use words you don’t understand, you’ll hurt yourself.
So, people inherit more of their parents IQ as they grow older?
Edit: I’d assume people are making use of the data which show significant reductions in crime in black areas in order to satisfy the requirements of your null hypothesis, which was something along the lines of “show me one successful area where the majority of people are black”.
When have I advocated that anyone on this forum be enslaved?
The sources I am most dependent on when asserting racial differences are the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics, 2010 (NCES 2011-015), Chapter 2.
the Bureau of Justice Statistics of the United States Department of Justice
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm
an OECD/PISA Study
and various sources listed here:
How have these sources been discredited?
It explains a lot.
If most Negroes are not genetically inferior, a very large percentage are morally inferior. It is immoral for them to commit all those crimes. It is immoral for them to have all those illegitimate children. It is immoral for black teenage thugs to disrupt classrooms and make it difficult for teachers to do their jobs. It is also immoral for so many black teenagers to be getting into trouble after school when they should be doing their homework.
No you haven’t, you obstinate asshole. All you’ve ever done is link to the same damn Wiki homicide rate link. I called you on your horse shit and proved that you were wrong. (Note that this differs substantially from from the unsupported assertions you continually engage in.)
No you haven’t, you shitfaced liar. The top half of my most recent post clearly lays out the actuality of the exchange. No where in that catalogue of idiocy did you stipulate any exceptions or modifications to the rule you asserted (“Countries with large black and/or American Indian populations tend to have higher crime rates than countries where nearly everyone is white or Oriental”; “Honduras gets its high murder rate from a number of factors including the American Indian ancestry of the mestizos.”) You are now engaging in post hoc rationalization.
If only the OP had sufficient intelligence to understand the standards and rules of this particular forum…
NDD has been called racist and received scorn deservedly because of actual behaviour. The ignoring of the scientific citations, the continued assertions that ignore the actual science that falsified his assertions of race genetic coherencies of long separation of populations, etc.
It is in fact almost always NDD who raises politics, and has shown that his only real understand and concern is about american racial politics.
He doesn’t even understand the difference between a direct relationship and an inverse one.
In other words, he actually disproved his own horseshit with his own cites. Beautiful.
Then it should be no problem for you to find a positive k constant, then.
Show your work.
Come on - put up or shut up, dickless.
NDD calling people out for ad hominems? In the Pit?
That’s rich.
An example of the last time I called out NDD on that particular hypocrisy. I suppose they’re not ad hominems but “facts and logical reasoning” when NDD does it.
And I know other posters have called out both NDD and his soulmate B84 on this particular bit of hypocrisy, too.
I know it’s hard to reflect on your own actions with your head so far up your ass, but it would be a good idea to step back for a few days and do so.