Of course… anything to change the subject away from the lie about a supposed contradiction that the lying liar brazil84 told about me.
Another lie by brazil84- in post #1100, when I was trying to answer brazil84’s question, I linked to a Nature article and use the exact phrase “coherent genetic structure”.
Do I need to take his post out of quotes and post it again for you to see this brazil84?
Don’t bother… he’s not really ignoring us. He just pretends he is- as he’s shown by responding to some posts from supposedly ignored posters.
Oh, I know this. If he was just ignoring you with the software, he’d see the quote. With his asinine way of doing things, I don’t know if he’d “see” anything you ever posted.
“and come back when you learn how to properly separate biological factors from social, economic, and environmental factors.”
This would require education it is pretty clear he doesn’t possess, so he literally can’t. Might as well ask my cat to bark…
I’m not going to engage with iiandyiiii by proxy.
The fact is that he contradicted himself. Deal with it.
A racist, a liar, and a coward. Although those three often seem to go together.
I’ll deal with the fact that you are wrong about iiandyiiii contradicting himself and that you are a liar saying he did. Post 1100 says exactly what he said it did and you deny it.
So a liar and a racist… I hope you’re proud.
Damn… he got the triple crown…
In science there is a bias in favor of the simpler explanation.
During the time of Ptolemy, which is to say during the first two centuries of the Christian Era, it seemed obvious that the sun and the planets revolved around the earth. Ptolemy developed an astronomical system based on that assumption.
However, as time went by measurements became more precise. The Ptolemaic system became increasingly complicated.
Copernicus, who lived from 1473 to 1543, thought to himself that the universe looks the way it does to us because we view it from the earth. He took existing calculations, and considered what the universe would look like from the surface of the sun. Suddenly, things became simple. Complex orbits around the earth became simple orbits around the sun.
Well, when it comes to the persistence of racial differences in crime and intelligence I hear that I am ignorant of science, logic, am a racist, and so on. No one who says those things can explain the persistence. I can. Some races are biologically superior to others. This superiority can be explained by different population pressures lasting hundreds and thousands of years.
Over a period of many generations civilization breeds civilized people. Savage conditions breed people who are currently revealing their savagery everywhere in the world that they live.
There’s an even greater bias in favor of the explanation that actually has supporting evidence. Yours has none.
Lol, you are wrong and you know it – otherwise you would not have evaded my question from before. Such a simple question too.
Yes of course. As they say, the curse of a wicked man is a blessing.
“No one can explain it” NDD?
:rolleyes:
Several times there were posted in this tread explanations for that, that you are claiming now that those do not exist is a big stinky lie.
Copernicus’ ideas were simpler, sure. But you know what was even more important? They were right (at least the part about the sun orbiting the earth- it took later scientists to figure out the orbits were elliptical, and not circular). And they were accepted not because they were simpler, but because they had tons of supporting evidence.
Such a simple question from such a simple mind… With such farseeing ineptitude you’ll go far.
I have presented plenty of supporting difference that racial differences exist, that they are major differences, that the same differences exist throughout the world, and that the differences persist. I have also presented a simple explanation of these differences.
I hate repeating myself, but address the following:
You still haven’t separated social, economic, or environmental factors out, nor have you shown how you jump straight to genetic without showing how you’ve eliminated other biological factors.
Your argument is baseless.
Copernicus? Great example. He showed planets orbited the sun. He NEVER SHOWED WHY OR HOW. He only showed that it happened. It wasn’t until Isaac Newton showed up with some pretty nifty ideas of his own that we had an explanation. And his stuff was verified by experiment.
Likewise, we know there’s an achievement gap. We know it’s there. What you have NOT proven is WHY OR HOW. You have your pet theory, but unlike Newton, you haven’t proven your framework via experiment.
You provided nothing to support your explanation. You’ve asserted there’s an achievement gap, which no one denies. And all you’ve done is provide more evidence for the gap that everyone already acknowledges.
It’s simple? Fine. Find some data that supports your “simple” explanation, and get back to us. I’ve told you multiple times what kind of data would support it.
**If **there is a Ringo that would take him to Pepperland. 