Well, I read everybody’s response, and I’m apalled. ONE of you “gamers” is a wargamer? That’s okay, DRY, we can whip 'em all. Or at least inflict massive casualties on their horde as they bear us down with their weight of numbers.
Can you see it, DRY? We’re standing back-to-back, last cartridges going in, bayonets fixed, and no way out. The inevitable last rush of barbarians washes over us. A furious spasm of desperate close-in fighting, and then the Regiment is gone, our passage marked by bloody snow and gunsmoke.
Oh, alright, I admit it: I’ve played non-historical games, too. Even liked some of 'em. But history gets me off, and I’d rather deal with 12-pounders than fireball spells.
LOVE miniature tabletop games, especially Bill-and-Bow, Pike-and-Shot, Horse-and-Musket, Rifle-and-Sabre, Soldiers-of-the-Queen. (That’s Medieval, Renaissance, Napoleonics, Civil War and Colonial periods for you non-grognards.)
Board games, too, but it’s a bitch to get one going anymore, so I haven’t played one for years. Except for my favorite game in this category: “Diplomacy”. I would rather play this than do any other activity that doesn’t involve gittin’ nekkid. (Hey…“Strip Co-ed Nekkid Diplomacy”…gonna give that one some serious thought…)
“Nuclear War”, Nuclear Escalation" and Nuclear Proliferation" are GREAT card games. I can get my non-gamer buds to play a round or two of that.
These days, I go in for computer wargames. Just about anything except for “Command & Conquer” and its clones. The only Real-time games I like tend to be historical in nature: Sid Meier’s “Gettysburg!”, and the newly-released “Shogun: Total War”. (Anybody wanna play sumpin’ by e-mail? Tell me what you’ve got, I’ll see if I’ve got a copy and we’ll get it on.)
And I dabbled in computer RPGs a little, too. Both “Fallout” games were cool. ANY LucasArts title is sure to be excellent. (Check out the “Monkey Isle” series; VERY good.).