Latex gloves are indeed a sensible idea, and you are indeed perceptive deej to think about the minority who do have a latex allergy, and suggest nitrile gloves.
In terms of damage to receptive partners, I reiterate what I’ve said. I hope I didn’t sound too rude bryan in my response to you, but I took your words to be dismissive and founded on a lack of understanding. Your thoughtful response has made your position clearer, but I am still wanting to disagree with your sources.
The Men Like Us reference has all the hall-marks of a trustworthy site. However it contains a familiar phrase, in the sentence “The inner walls of the lower colon, often described as having the consistency of wet paper towels, are soft and easily torn.”
Those “wet paper towels” are also referred to in The Joy Of Gay Sex, and the phrase had me fearful for years. The fact is that tiny tears in the lining of that area can easily occur during anal intercourse, and with the presence of any object there. But unlike a wet paper towel, the walls of the lower colon do not give way and collapse into a sodden mass. They are strong and have continuing integrity.
Look - human beings write sex manuals, and like all of us are likely to transfer their own fears and fantasies into what they compile. Discussion of women’s enjoyment of the sexual act in medical texts from the turn of the century are hair-raising reading today. As a teenager, I was repeatedly informed that my homosexuality was caused by my mothers domineering ways and my father’s feeble interactions with me - a laughable theory in 2001.
True, I have seen a prolapsed rectum, which I am sure was caused by repeated vigorous use of very large dildoes by the person who owned it. My understanding is that it can also be caused by straining during bowel movements.
But there are far too many people I have met who have been receptive partners in handballing for many years, who have retained strong muscle control in the sphincter, and who have no problems such as those described in the sources available, for me to any longer take that information at face value.
Note that I’m not saying that this anecdotal evidence is proof. Merely that it causes me to examine the proferred evidence with scepticism and to suggest that it is in fact another form of anecdotal evidence, that no scientific studies appear to have been undertaken, and that, in my opinion, it’s suspect.
I am now looking for a thread on flowers and butterflies and pixies, as um, a restorative. See you all there…
Redboss