That “article” is one of the most slanted, one-sided, distorted pieces of yellow journalism I have ever read. I hope you are not getting all your information-gathering from sources such as that.
As to your assertion that “Sexual Harrassment Claims have almost tripled in recent years even though the laws have been getting tighter and men have been made more enlightened” - well, first, it is just common sense that if the laws against something are getting tighter, then more people will have a possible basis to sue over those laws being broken. And second, if the number of lawsuits really is increasing to the extent you say it is, then maybe men aren’t getting as enlightened as you apparently believe yourself to be.
You could have had a good flame, or even a good Great Debates topic, if you had just reported the truth. What was your point in inventing some piece of garbage?
my question for you, Gomez, is this: why would you go out and lie to spark a conversation? I could start a conversation without any actual evidence . . . like, oh, that the root of baseball is actually a bastardized version of golf and soccer. I would be (if I am correct) trolling . . . saying something to deliberately get people riled up.
On this message board, in my experience, if you’re going to debate something or try to make a point, the majority of the intelligent posters here aren’t going to believe a word of it until you have a source. You can go ahead and say that toilets are being rebuilt and such, but without a source (and a picture or a FOAF doesn’t work) you’re about as credible as a fiction book.
Hey, don’t flame the guy too bad! Thanks to him and his ahem exaggeration, I now know a new and improved way to pee in the woods, an invaluable skill. I’ve alwyas been able to do it, but it’s even easier to keep clean now.
And what’s odd is when I have a conversation with my male friends about the gender differences, their first point is alwyas that THEY can pee their names in the snow… We’ll show them, won’t we girls?
And, as a side, semi-serious note, not all feminists are agressive dykes, ok? I consider myself very much a feminist (or, if you prefer, an equalist) by believing in equal rights for both genders. So watch your generalizations, ok?
Last time I went to a disco here in Sweden there was a very long line to the women toilet. “Glad I’m a man, I just go in do my thing and go”. I was quite surprised when there was a woman in there using the urinal, not using the device Soda was talking about. She just stood on her toes and kinda bent over. I’m surprised she actually succeded.
I’m glad the OP is just bullshit. As a law student I have to abide every law all the time
Personally, the idea that all feminists are “dykes” and bitches just kills me.
Hello? What does someone’s sexual preference have to do with their politics?
Excuse me, but that offends me greatly, as I have a great many gay friends who are very sweet,
warm, intelligent people.
The posts in here are 95% retarded. So Gomez bullshitted a little. If anything, he had you goin’. You people just don’t have any answers for his well pointed out point.
I’d like to here some statements or answers to his first point. Some good one’s. Especially from any women that have been harrassed. The boss holds your job over your head for some head, I understand, the bastard should fry. But stupid shit like a situation in which a co-worker asks you out for a date, you say no, and that’s it, and then you sue him - bullshit. Even after it was a one time question and he leaves you alone after the fact kinda thing. Stuff like the first grader kissing another first grader on the cheek, i’ve heard this in the news, stuff like that is just silly.
Just what was his first point? I couldn’t find one amidst all the bullshit.
And if Gomez was acting like an adult, in contrast to everyone else who responded to his post, please tell us immature folk what was “adult” about making up a ridiculous story.
:rolleyes:
Then start a thread in GD expressing the point of the OP, stand tall on the parapet of your rhetorical fortress while the armies of Bull-Dyke Feminaziism gnash their unbrushed teeth in frustration at your unimpeachable arguments, and score an easy victory for yourself.
Gather 'round, all you idiots who think it’s no big deal whether people here tell the truth or not. {Yeah, this includes all the people with their nose up Serlinel’s ass in the “Smut Shop” thread in MPSIMS.}
The integrity of this place goes down the pisser pretty quickly when people don’t follow the tenets of truth, accuracy and the Cecilian way.
Don’t agree? Please, feel free to take it to one of 10,000 other message boards out there in cyberspace, where you can make up false facts, pretend to be someone other than your pathetic little self and generally lie to your heart’s content.
