Sherlock series 2, U.S. airing [open spoilers]

This was my favorite episode so far. It had some of the wittiest, funniest lines of the whole series to date and had me laughing many times.

In particular, when he was describing that witness to the hiker death as “morbidly obese, has halitosis, lives in his mother’s basement looking at internet porn - does that sound like a master criminal to you?”, and then we see the poor man still in the room behind him looking mortified.

I like how we see Sherlock being protective of Mrs. Hudson. There are several necessary departures in this series from the original canon, but it’s important to preserve this core relationship. “Mrs. Hudson leave Baker Street? England would fall!”

Watched the end of this ep last night. Yep, they did allude to him saving her, but - to use Seinfeld language - they “yada yada’d” him saving her - “so she’s trapped, about to be beheaded, Sherlock shows up, yada yada - she’ll be in a later episode.”

I enjoyed the competition/flirtation between Sherlock and Adler. But (spoilers) they have Irene unequivocally falling for Sherlock (her bold flirting, her accelerated pulse and acknowledgement of it and, finally, the phone’s secret code - which was a fun wordplay). But do we know if Sherlock is in love with her or just finds her a compelling mind? He seems to refuse her repeated “invitations to dinner” pretty comfortably. He seems captivated but in control; whereas she seems captivated and can’t control it…

But yeah, overall, this is really top stuff. The writing is wonderful - don’t want to get cute with Whedon taking a victory lap for The Avengers right now, but there is a cool Buffy feel about this: individual cases but with an underlying Big Bad story arc; incredibly compelling characters where the stories focus on their idiosyncratic interactions and the human condition as much as the mysteries.

Since Steven Moffat is the guy behind this and Dr. Who - is his Dr. Who similarly constructed?

Kinda…the wordplay and characterisation is certainly similar. He’s only written two episodes of Sherlock, and doesn’t write the majority of Who either, but it is possible in both to see his influence as show-runner.

Sherlock is either gay or asexual, more likely asexual - it’s very heavily implied that he’s still a virgin. It’s unlikely that he’s in love with her.

Sounds like “asexual, in that he has no time for love vs. The Game” - found this paragraph on the Irene Adler Wiki page, quoted from the original Holmes story that featured her (bolding mine):

One can love and/or respect someone with have sexual feelings towards him or her. He may be in love with her rather than in lust with her, very much admiring her brains. Though, from the reactions (minimal, granted, but still there) he seems to have some sexual feelings in him, just repressed or he’s made a decision to avoid relationships for whatever reason. Because, you know, you don’t have to be asexual to be celibate. Given his social ineptitude opting out of intimate relations may be more comfortable for Sherlock than being in one.

I enjoyed the part where he encountered the nude Irene Adler and Sherlock couldn’t find find any ‘tells’ on her. Here is a man that could reconstruct a man’s life history from his waistcoat, but Irene Adler remained a mystery.

Overall I’m enjoying it, but I do have a few complaints.

First, the last cliffhanger, with them at the pool confronted by Moriarty. Okay, you’ve just been confronted by the badguy, and had snipers painting a target on you. Bad guy runs off for what ever reason. My immediate reaction after ditching the bomb vest is to duck into the building so I’m not sitting in the open courtyard. Because I don’t like that there are multiple snipers roaming around out there. But that’s just me. I can maybe get that Watson was so relieved he just kinda collapsed. But why didn’t Sherlock ping on that?

I, too, am confused by the Bond Air plan. They learned some terrorists had a plan to bomb a plane, so they were going to blow up a plane to hide they knew it. But how do they get the terrorists to plant the bomb on the right plane? They have a load of bodies, but as mentioned, the real issue is do they have a load of stories - families, relatives, people missing their loved ones. If they use already dead people, then those people would reveal the whole thing. So somehow they have to invent a whole planeload of stories and families? Next, as mentioned, allowing the plane to explode still causes panic and social upheaval.

I agree about the ending as well. Sure, it’s amusing that “Only Sherlock could have fooled me, and I think you will agree it is exceedingly unlikely he was onhand,” so therefore he was onhand. But while Sherlock is a genius and more physically involved than his brother Mycroft, he’s not James Bond or Jason Bourne. He can’t teleport around the globe. How did he travel there, how did he infiltrate the group? How did they get away? Plausibility is strained.

Also, I was totally thrown when they were at the Christmas party and the lady in the red dress showed up. I had no clue who she was until later they went to the morgue. I was effing clueless? Who is she? How does she know them? Why is Sherlock picking on her (other than that’s what he does?) I was lost. Also, was she the same lady that got tricked by Jim Moriarty?

That was Molly, the same coroner who’s been on the show – and obviously infatuated with Sherlock – since the first episode. Yes, she was the one who was taken in by Moriarty.

Sherlock has known Molly was attracted to him from the first episode. (Somehow I think somebody who looks like that would recognize the symptoms.) He’d occasionally compliment her hairdo or something–to get access to a body relevant to one of his cases.

His deductions at the Christmas party revealed that her feelings were deeper. She was hurt & told him–so he apologized & gave her a nice Christmas kiss. John Watson was astounded–Sherlock* never* apologizes…

(Molly is a totally original character with no counterpart in ACD’s stories. Although we were told that he’d been known to beat cadavers to gather evidence; Moffat thought that would make a good way to introduce Our Hero* in the very first episode.)

  • Although I think John Watson more than carries his weight as a character. Cumberbatch is obviously brilliant but Martin Freeman displays wit, strength & real depth of feeling…

He also seems to use her to get access to a forensics laboratory, as well.
A detail from Scandal in Belgravia which just clicked for me this instant (though I’m sure you guys figured it out at the time):

When checking out the guy who showed up to take him away to meet a mystery client, Sherlock noted (among other things) the dog hair on his suit, and deduced the presence of three small dogs. He then says “I know exactly where I’m going.”

Corgis, of course. Duh!

And his realizations about the dogs were accompanied by “arf”, “arf, arf”, “arf, arf, arf.” The sound design on the show is excellent. (Along with the music, the directing, cinematography, acting, etc.)

Well, I can’t answer the rest, but I was presuming in regards to the first question that the authorities didn’t merely have reliable intelligence on the bomb plot but had actually captured the terrorist who was supposed to plant or set off the bomb but didn’t want the rest of the terrorist organization to know, at least for some time, that their asset was compromised. :wink: Thus, the bombing has to go off (pun intended) as scheduled. Maybe the ruse only had to “work” for a short time, before the human-interest-profile phase of news coverage would kick in.

I liked his outward show of aloofness to the point of cruelty, while his real feelings were indicated by a Sherlock Scan focused on ways to put some serious hurting on the goon.

Like the “burglar” accidentally fell out of the window.

“Just how many times did he fall?”
“I lost track.”

In case you’re looking, he also did a sitcom called “Coupling” (in the UK, the US one didn’t work as well for various reason) and a short miniseries called “Jekyll.” (they used to be available on Netflix streaming). Both are quite good and you can see ties between his various pieces of work. They’re very Moffat-y.

Jekyll is brilliant. Do yourself a favor and look it up. It’s not a retelling of Jekyll and Hyde, it’s a sequel to it. Watch the series in order, it’s very important.

Enjoy,
Steven

He also did part of the screenplay for the Tintin movie. An incredibly talented writer.

I thought this episode was certainly entertaining… but also had a few teeth-grittingly implausible moments:
(1) a guy was killed by being hit on the head by a boomerang? Uh-huh… the kind of boomerangs that actually come back are just not very heavy.
(2) as others have pointed out, the twist ending with Sherlock infiltrating the terror cell is just a scene from a different show entirely (not to mention that whatever ungodly place they were in apparently had cell reception compatible with Sherlock’s British cell phone)
(3) the main airplane plot makes less sense the more you think about it. So, I guess the sequence of events is this:
(a) There’s a group of terrorists planning to bomb flight 007
(b) MI5 (or whoever) has infiltrated them
© MI5 learns about this plot
(d) MI5 comes up with the plan of launching a plane full of corpses so the terrorists can go ahead with their plan and think they succeeded, not realizing they have been infiltrated
(e) Some MI5 guy brags to Irene about this, in vague terms, she takes a picture of an email he has
(f) She doesn’t know what this email is or what’s in it, so she calls up Jim Moriarty and says “hey, I have some potentially valuable info”, and he is so excited that he abandons his kill-Sherlock-Holmes-by-the-pool plan and dashes off
(g) He organizes things so that Sherlock Holmes meets her, knowing that Sherlock will instantly crack the code
(h) Sherlock cracks the code
(i) Irene calls Moriarty back, tells him that it’s seats on a jumbo jet
(j) Moriarty then immediately grasps the overall plot
(k) Moriarty does something that ruins the plot and profits from it
(l) Moriarty calls up Mycroft to taunt him about it

OK, aside from the preposterous overcomplexity of it, here are some implausibilities, right off the top of my head:
(d) is superficially clever, but makes less sense the more you think about it. The corpses really add nothing, it’s not like there are going to be photos of the wreckage on the ocean floor published. And of course there’s the issue of the lack of grieving families that someone is going to twig onto. Not to mention that the airline will have to be in on the secret

(f) is also questionable… Irene is obviously a smart cookie. But she seems to make a good living in the dominatrix business. If she just hangs onto this photo to use as leverage in some hypothetical future when she needs leverage, then she can continue her happy and safe life indefinitely. Instead she takes an action that is pretty much guaranteed to bring her to the attention of lots of people who will want to kill her. And it’s also unclear why Moriarty would so instantly find “I have some information that’s in code that a guy from the government bragged was important” so instantly fascinating.

(g) Doesn’t make much sense… Moriarty is also a genius. If Sherlock can crack the “code” in under a minute, Moriarty could presumably do so in a few hours. (Not to mention, of course, that this all depends on it not being a “code” at all. Nothing we’ve seen leads us to believe that Sherlock could break actual cryptographic codes in under a minute, or ever.)

(i) How does knowing that it’s seats on a jumbo jet let Moriarty deduce the full scope of the plan?

(k) How does Moriarty know who to contact in order to profit, and what to tell them? How would that transaction work?

(l) And assuming Moriarty is profiting by telling the bad guys they’ve been infiltrated, then he turns right around and screws them over by telling MI5 that they know. Obviously it’s way way more valuable to the baddies if they know they’ve been infiltrated by MI5 doesn’t know they know.

(I suppose that (l) isn’t an issue of Moriarty is just trying to cause chaos, not actually make money, but have we seen any sign of that?)

Oh, and while we’re at it, the whole sniper standoff by the pool last season made no sense either, but that’s a different topic.

I don’t think Moriarty profited monetarily from that. I think his sole motivation was fucking with the Holmes boys and screwing up their plans. …I think.