septimus, the traditional response to having a small penis is to buy a pistol or a large SUV, not just to increase your font size.
Regards,
Shodan
septimus, the traditional response to having a small penis is to buy a pistol or a large SUV, not just to increase your font size.
Regards,
Shodan
Your obsession with the size of penises other than your own is rather disturbing.
Thanks for quoting the penis-obsessor. It’s good to confirm that my decision to ignore Shodildo-brain was a wise one.
Yes, there’s evidence that Martin punched Zimmerman. But there’s no evidence that Martin acted aggressively towards Zimmerman. There’s such a thing as self-defense, in every state except Florida.
There is forensic evidence he punched him, multiple times, and bashed his head on the street. I believe this meets the accepted definition of aggression, as no such wounds were found on Martin.
To not meet the definition of aggression, you would have to believe Zimmerman instigated the physical confrontation, yet got no punches in- possible, yes, probable no.
So pointing a gun at someone doesn’t qualify as instigation?
My understanding from the reading the court transcript, years ago so I could be wrong, is that Zimmerman denied doing this and claimed he was attacked by Martin from behind. No witnesses to the attack to confirm or deny.
So calling him an Uncle Fucker would have been better? Sorry, denying that he is an uncle fucker.
Link NSFW, obviously.
HEY HEY!
Lest we forget that Shodan and Zimmerman aren’t the only assholes being pitted here. I present, in the Oh Yeah He Said It With A Straight Face category this post by fucknutz:
Ah, so only Zimmerman gets to stand his ground. Not the kid being followed by a dude with a gun.
Oh, well if the only survivor of the confrontation said so, that’s gotta be hammered into lead as the fifth Gospel.
It would, so we would need to examine the evidence to see if Zimmerman instigated the incident by pointing a gun at Martin. There is no evidence that he did, and circumstantial evidence that he did not. Namely, that if Zimmerman had been pointing a gun at Martin, it is unlikely that Zimmerman would wait until Martin knocked him down, broke his nose, blackened his eyes, and sat on his chest pounding his head into the ground, to fire.
Only if it’s backed up by evidence (see above), even apart from the presumption of innocence.
Regards,
Shodan
Stand your ground is invoked where a physical confrontation takes place. Zimmerman roaming the neighborhood looking for crime was stupid, racist, all that, but has zero to do with stand your ground laws.
Plus, it is difficult to stand your ground when someone is sitting on your chest.
Regards,
Shodan
How on Earth can you say Zimmerman for certain instigated the physical confrontation when there is zero physical evidence to back it up, and there are no witnesses? Just because he is a horrible human being does not mean he instigated the physical confrontation. Bad people can be the victims of crimes as well as good ones.
From where do you even get the notion that this happened?
I’ve been posting on this board since 2001, and this the first thing you’ve ever said that was actually correct.
Kudos, sir! Admitting there’s a problem is the first step.
When I click on the View Post link in your quote of me, I go to some thread about flea control. I assume this is not meant to be ironic.
Regards,
Shodan
My apologies. I was posting from my phone, and must have transposed a number or two in the link. It was supposed to show your first post in this thread.
Try here.