Shodan...

[Sam_Stone]

Actually, I took that picture as a parody of the National Lampoon cover. There was a ‘vote for the best web site’ contest a few years ago, and a bunch of web sites were plugging themselves saying, ‘vote for us because we’re the coolest, yada yada yada’. I found the whole thing fairly ridiculous, then I remembered that Lampoon cover, so I took a picture of my dog, put it on the front page of our site and said “Vote for us, or we’ll kill this dog”.

We didn’t win.

If you want to see our dog at her best, this is her web page. My seven-year-old daughter set that up.

All joking aside, she’s the best dog in the world. And she loves the blues.

[Kyla]

Sam, your dog is adorable. I am pretty sure she wants to come hang out with me. I mean, sure, she gets to run around in your backyard now, but if she stayed with me, she’d get to live in a tiny apartment in Chicago! And what dog doesn’t want that?

[rjung]

@Starving Artist

Uh….rjung? Are you reading my posts at least somewhat carefully? I was talking about the increase in the number of conservative posters to this board. I have had no contact with Karl Rove.

Given that the Republican Party has already been caught faking “grass-roots” letters expressing support for their favorite causes and candidates, the idea of sending GOP flunkies on the internet to talk up Bush’s re-election is hardly a stretch of the imagination.

Or, to paraphrase from a popular cartoon, “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a Republican intern.”

[Starving_Artist]

@rjung

Given that the Republican Party has already been caught faking “grass-roots” letters expressing support for their favorite causes and candidates, the idea of sending GOP flunkies on the internet to talk up Bush’s re-election is hardly a stretch of the imagination.

If that were the case, I’d think our ranks would have “swollen” by more than 5 or 6 in the last nine months…and besides, I was just kidding anyway. An increase of 5 or 6 conservatives over a nine month period isn’t really all that stunning, you know. And besides, if we were Bushco plants, wouldn’t you expect us to have more facts and some sort of pre-planned objective we tried to steer the conversation to, rather than just going with the flow and getting our asses kicked every time we uttered a conservative word?

[andros]

I don’t get this “5 or 6 new conservatives” thing you’ve pulled out of your ass. What you actually mean is that there are a few more people who not only share your particular brand of conservatism but also your unique way of espressing it.

There are lots of normal conservatives around. You needn’t think that shrill and annoying are the only prerequisites.

[Clothahump]

@Miller

And on top of that, he has a girl’s name, too.

Slight aside here - FWIW, Shodan is the term used in Japanese martial arts to denote someone who has achieved the rank of First Degree Black Belt.

[Jackmannii]

The “plant” idea is hysterical.

This line is pretty hysterical too:

@StarvingArtist

And besides, if we were Bushco plants, wouldn’t you expect us to have more facts…

Um, not necessarily.

[EddyTeddyFreddy]

@Starving Artist

. And besides, if we were Bushco plants, wouldn’t you expect us to have more facts and some sort of pre-planned objective

Not if you’re potted.

[EddyTeddyFreddy]

@andros

IThere are lots of normal conservatives around. You needn’t think that shrill and annoying are the only prerequisites.

Sorry, SA, old buddy, but this one made me laugh out loud.

[Miller]

@Clothahump

Slight aside here - FWIW, Shodan is the term used in Japanese martial arts to denote someone who has achieved the rank of First Degree Black Belt.

I did not know that. Thanks!

(He still has a girl’s name. And he talks funny, too.)

[astorian]

@Diogenes the Cynic

I do not spew ad hominems in GD, and I am not pitting Shodan for disagreeing with me, I’m pitting him for being an intellectually dishonest debater and for calling me a liar about my own opinions. I am quite capable of carryin on a debate without resorting to personal attacks or obsecenities, so fucky you, asshole.

Yes you are, and no you’re not.

[Miller]

@astorian

@Diogenes the Cynic

I do not spew ad hominems in GD, and I am not pitting Shodan for disagreeing with me, I’m pitting him for being an intellectually dishonest debater and for calling me a liar about my own opinions. I am quite capable of carryin on a debate without resorting to personal attacks or obsecenities, so fucky you, asshole.

Yes you are, and no you’re not.

Yes he is what? Yes, he is spewing ad hominems in GD? Yes, he is pitting Shodan for disagreeing with him? Yes, he is pitting Shodan for being dishonest? Yes, he is a liar about his own opinions?

Sorry, but snarkiness isn’t something just anyone can do. I recommend you refrain from it until you’re better able to make it clear what you’re being snarky about.

[Starving_Artist]

@andros

I don’t get this “5 or 6 new conservatives” thing you’ve pulled out of your ass. What you actually mean is that there are a few more people who not only share your particular brand of conservatism but also your unique way of espressing it.

This 5 or 6 new conservatives thing I’ve pulled out of my ass was a joke! I was alluding to the fact there aren’t very many of us. I imagine a hell of a lot more liberals have come aboard in this time, and I was making fun of the fact there are so few of us conservatives.

@andros

There are lots of normal conservatives around. You needn’t think that shrill and annoying are the only prerequisites.

Such as? Name me some regular conservative posters around here other than the ones mentioned in this thread.

P.S.: Funny, but I think “shrill and annoying” is a very apt description of most of the liberals I see on here. Could it be that one person’s reasoned argument or expression of disgust is another person’s “shrill and annoying?” I think so!

Jackmannii, I knew *somebody *was gonna say something like that. But I mean, seriously, isn’t that just a little over the top?

EddyTeddyFreddy, that’s okay. I’m sure you’re still smarting over our last encounter…you know, stormtroopers, re-education camps?

[EddyTeddyFreddy]

@Starving Artist

EddyTeddyFreddy, that’s okay. I’m sure you’re still smarting over our last encounter…you know, stormtroopers, re-education camps?

:: snort ::

Smarting over… :dubious: Honeychile, I rolled you up into a little ball and dribbled you down the hall.

[Lord_Ashtar]

I’m curious as to what Diogenes reaction is to the link that Shodan provided right before he left, but I somehow doubt he’ll be back.

[LeeshaJoy]

I have no dog in this fight, but I just wanted to say that…

@Diogenes the Cynic

fucky you

…should be a SDMB catchphrase, alongside “Fucko off” and “Gotcha ya.”

[Silocke]

Awwwwwwwww Sam that is the cutest dog in the world, and bear in mind I don’t even like dogs. I can’t hurt the little fuzzball.

Miller:

Yes he is what? Yes, he is spewing ad hominems in GD? Yes, he is pitting Shodan for disagreeing with him? Yes, he is pitting Shodan for being dishonest? Yes, he is a liar about his own opinions?

Yeah I didn’t get what astorian was referring to either. Maybe he just lost it and had a moment of drug-laden craziness, then he hacked his neighbour’s dog to pieces (what is it with me and this continual theme of animal violence? I’m sure they’ll bring up charges soon).

[Diogenes_the_Cynic]

@Lord Ashtar

I’m curious as to what Diogenes reaction is to the link that Shodan provided right before he left, but I somehow doubt he’ll be back.

I’m right here, fucko.

My reaction to the link is good for him but it has nothing to do with this thread.

[andros]

P.S.: Funny, but I think “shrill and annoying” is a very apt description of most of the liberals I see on here. Could it be that one person’s reasoned argument or expression of disgust is another person’s “shrill and annoying?” I think so!

I agree. The unreasonable person always thinks himself reasonable. Ideology is irrelevant to this.

[Starving_Artist]

@EddyTeddyFreddy

:: snort ::

Smarting over… :dubious: Honeychile, I rolled you up into a little ball and dribbled you down the hall.

How funny the way these things are in the eye of the beholder. I interpreted your second link to mean I had left you virtually speechless, struggling for words, and rushing off to try out logic and life experience on someone else…you know, to see if it really works.

All I can tell you is that it has for me.