Should also have her hair under better control around machinery.
These tedious motherfuckers are back again?
If it was her, I think the dress code should have gotten her in trouble.
Having said that, the underwhelming number of protesters I noticed on videos of 19th protest included shots of guys with signs like “Fags Out!”, charming fellows.
That the teacher exists and the story as reported so far is correct. The pictures and video are genuine. I stated that above. That’s all I have had confirmed.
…your source has the original photographs?
One is an eyewitness, in fact. The other knows the teacher well. The pictures are genuine. If you don’t want to believe it, your call.
…this wasn’t an answer to my question.
No, so far as I am aware, the source doesn’t have the original photographs. That is not why I am entirely confident the story is genuine.
…but why are you confident the photos are genuine and haven’t been digitally altered?
There are a lot of photos. I don’t have any firsthand knowledge and I’d be amazed if they were fake. Never mind that they seem to be frames from videos.
If they AND the video have all been digitally altered the same way, that would be quite something. Why would I think they had been? In what way? I don’t see how they could have been altered that well in any way that matters.
I live here, so I offered verification of the basics of the story in case it wasn’t true at all.
…I’ve already stated that the videos I’ve seen and the photos that I’ve seen are NOT digitally altered in the same way. The photos and the video (that I’ve seen) are different, even though the outfits are the same.
Nobody in the thread are really questioning the “basics of the story.” Just the specifics.
Uh… yeah, some people were. Go back and read the thread. Atamasama expressed skepticism in the first reply. DocCathode seemed to agree with that skepticism, scudsucker in post 22 still wasn’t convinced it was true. And at first I questioned it. The internet can spread phony ass stories like wildfire, or can take a true thing and lie about it.
…and that skepticism was valid.
You haven’t convinced me that the photos I’ve seen haven’t been digitally altered. Merely asserting that “the pictures are genuine” with the proof being “Why would I think they had been?” really isn’t enough.
The internet can spread phony ass stories like wildfire, or can take a true thing and lie about it. If you can’t actually demonstrate that the photos (that I’ve seen, at least) haven’t been digitally altered, then perhaps stop acting as if you know that they haven’t, and just tell us what you do know instead.
What’s the argument over, again? Whether the tits on the comically large breasts have been added digitally or not?
Well, why did you say no one questioned the basics of the story, then? Some were, so I made an effort to confirm the basics. I confirmed them. That’s it.
That’s no context at all. Do you know someone, and you asked them, “Is this story correct,” and they said, “Yep”? Did they volunteer that they know Lemieux?
I’m still profoundly suspicious of this story, and your confirmation doesn’t really help, since it doesn’t help explain what’s going on. Some more context around how you got this confirmation, and exactly what it was, might help.
Edit: sorry, saw your replies. if you have a contact who “knows the teacher well,” would you mind asking them what the fuck is going on here?
Yes. One has seen her since the school year started, and the other hasn’t seen her this school year but knows her and know the story is true as reported so far.
Surely at this point we all agree the story’s true, right? We have a lot more media outlets confirming it.
As to asking my sources what’s going on, it may not be a reasonable ask to ask one of my buddies (well, just one - one just got out of gastric bypass surgery) to go to Lemieux and ask what the fuck is going on. They told me what they think but they can’t read Lemeiux’s mind and don’t REALLY know and there’s no informative value in repeating it. I don’t really care about Lemieux’s motivations, anyway.
Part of the the problem here is that there’s not just one, “The story.” What specific story is true?
Same with, “The pictures are real.” Which pictures? You get the idea.
What specific things did your friends confirm?
Personally I think your confirmation means more.
I’m just speaking from my own perspective.
But I believe that the basic story is true. I don’t believe any details added by Reduxx or other TERFs or right-wing radicals.