I assume that someone sincere about identifying as another race would alter their appearance accordingly, just as trans women do. By doing so, they’d be divesting themselves of their white privilege, which, as I said, would be strong evidence of their sincerity.
After the controversy regarding Dolezal’s racial identity became public, the NAACP released a statement in support of her leadership
In June 2015, psychologist Halford Fairchild said, “Rachel Dolezal is black because she identifies as black. Her identity was authentic, as far as I could tell.”[104] Sociologist Ann Morning also defended Dolezal, saying: “We’re getting more and more used to the idea that people’s racial affiliation and identity and sense of belonging can change, or can vary, with different circumstances.”[
I’m aware of Dolezal’s case, but I’m also aware that, regardless of what Professors Fairchild and Morning feel about her, she was widely derided among the general public. Now, I’ve seen Dolezal’s documentary on Netflix and there is absolutely no doubt in my mind whatsoever that she genuinely believes herself to be black. As far as I can tell, she believes herself to be black as much as a trans woman believes herself to be a woman. This brings us back to our original question: can one sincerely self-identify as another race in the same way one can sincerely self-identify as another gender, and if not, why not? What do you think?
Race and sex are very different things. Why would you assume they work the same way?
Transgender people aren’t a thought experiment. They’re real people, who have a genuine experience of feeling a disconnect between their biological sex and their social gender, to the extent that about half of them will be suicidal at some point in their lives. Are there millions of people who feel a disconnect between the race they were born as, the race they want to be seen as? Is this disconnect so deep that it’s a genuine mental health crisis for people experiencing it? No. There are not. If there were, “transracialism” would be a thing worth discussing, but it’s not a thing that actually exists. You’ve got one contemporary example of ome woman who pretended to be a different race for significant financial and professional gain, and about a century ago, a lot of Black people who passed as White to escape invidious, pervasive racism, but there’s absolutely no evidence for the existence of “transracialism” that’s remotely comparable to the well documented, extensively studied phenomenon of transgenderism.
If we can validate any presentation of trans woman as woman, even the shop teacher with a breast fetish and a toxic masculinity chip on her shoulder, why shouldn’t we validate people who feel in their bones they’re a different ethnicity? Rachel as a Black woman or Hilaria Baldwin( formerly known as Hilary ) as a ethnic Spaniard?
But is it fair if Rachel receives benefits reserved for born as Blacks, or transwoman might receive benefits reserved people born as females?
The first time i saw him on TV in his adulthood, i asked my husband why a white woman was singing an African-themed song. He seems to have had race-change surgery.
Could I get a cite on literally any part of that statement? I mean, I know you don’t have one, but I’m asking anyways. The current assumption I’m making is that your spreading rumors because your scared of transsexuals.
You are conflating the issues. The thread so far has been about the purported case. The vast majority here say that the purported outfit was inappropriate, and would likely say that the racial equivalent, blackface with exaggerated racial characteristics, would also be inappropriate. I can’t speak for others, but I’d guess that people here wouldn’t have a problem with someone who simply changed their hair style, and wore an outfit typical of a Black professional (if there is even a distinctive one for teachers).
There are quite a few studies showing how the brains of people who identify as female and male are different from each other (I linked to a few earlier in this thread). That is empirical evidence. I am not aware of similar results in studies regarding the brains of different races.
By that I mean, showing how the brain of a person who is of white ancestry but identifies as Black resembles someone of Black ancestry compared to someone who who identifies as White. As far as I know, that just isn’t a thing.
Well in this very thread one of our esteemed posters mentioned the toxic masculinity exhibited by the teacher from a reportedly anonymous source.
And it’s has been widely reported in the news that the school is supporting their trans teacher, albeit one with a breast fetish and prone to toxic masculinity.
OK, maybe someone who identifies as a member of a particular race or ethnicity is a member of that race or ethnicity. So what? Is there supposed to be some “gotcha” there?
I’m not actually claiming anything. I’m asking you or anyone else where they draw the line. I think one needs to do more than simply say they are a woman in order to be a woman. Or a man. Or black. Or Chinese. Or 23. Or anything really. Otherwise, why have definitions?