Shut the Fuck Up Alaric the Goth

Romance — Older Men" to the point where it inflicted “severe emotional distress and physical injury that is of a nature no reasonable man could be expected to endure it.”

God forbid I should hijack a thread of which I am the principle topic, but don’t you people ever lighten up enough to even glance at:

“Romance–Older Men”.

Pause in your efficient if weirdly motivated deconstruction of my posting style and ask yourself “wtf??” A chatroom.? It’s bad enough to expose one’s intellectual idiosyncrisies (look what it gets me…) but Romance, older men.?

I don’t think so…

But he does it (allegedly) without benefit of pharmacological intervention…I am but the student, he is the master…

a moebius post, as it were…

At the risk of quoting myself (a hanging offense…) I repeat my brief reply above.

If it be not excessively churlish, may I urge the disappointment I feel that Ms.Rat showed no interest in this intellectual cheese.

For our sakes, please wear something!

you see, right there, a man tries to take a few steps towards freedom, some small minded observer steps up to slap him down…

If that’s what he’s doing, then isn’t that against the rules?

:dubious:

which is not to say that a terry cloth towel laid upon the sitting surface to be used for the duration of the moderating session would mark one as excessively fastidious…

alas, secondary to some strange neurochemical imbalance, or perhaps a selective dyslexia, I process “rules” as “suggestions”

Oh no, I find you perfectly humorous. But writing back a post just to go “lol” is a bit excessive.

And I’m a Mister, but I’m not sexist so whichever you want to call me is fine. That is, up to the point that you try and feel me up of course. :wink:

  • try and feel me up*

call me small-minded, but I insist on the operation…

You’re small-minded.

Oh c’mon, you were asking for it. :smiley:

well, it’s kind of a sore point with me, for reasons utterly unrelated to the discussion at hand.

mygirlfirnd several back had an ineluctable urge to fuck a “fully-functioning pre-op trans=sexuial” (which is apparently a Niche identification, requiring a careful titration of estrogen (usually black-market) so as not to overwhelm the testosterone necessary for “full function”…)
She useed to reproach my insistence on the operation (hereabove reiterated) …by asking whether I would object to a POST op transexual fucking her witha strap on.

Well, she had me there…

What, for a pitee not to take his pitting seriously? Where the hell is there a rule against that? You certainly can’t be accusing him of trolling in this thread, now can you? 'Cos it’s a pitting, started with a “STFU”, I’d say any coherent responses he chooses to give are above-board.

That’s what you think, buddy. Hold the line for a second, will ya?..

<<AGENT KOWALSKIIIIIIIIIII!!! How much longer must I wait for those co-ordinates???>>

fiddle with your puny dials…

then look out the window

all your women are belong to us!!

Bomb shelters don’t have windows.

<<KOWAL…oh, there you are, it’s a Code 7, Kowalski, y’know, the Woman Prisoner thing…what? Oh…>>

Listen dude, Kowalski says you can keep the women, they only cause trouble anyway.

That is what you do, yes?

no, I diddle with punny files

Sage Rat,

I should have just waited a day or so to figure out what was going on. The post- a-thon going on here is quite enough information for me. Thanks for your earlier insights.

AND WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNED GRASSHOPPER?