Well, I admit defeat. We are obviously no match for the superior intellect of fatherjohn, so we might as well give up. In fact, I’m so humbled that I have created a new signature, announcing my defeat at the hands of the master debater, in hopes that everyone will come and read his awe-inspiring wisdom.
Let’s hear it for fatherjohn! He must be very proud.
hey, what’s up with that? hopefully my spiff new signature will work this time. I checked the “show signature” box, and it showed up in the preview and everything…
Ummm, false. If you had taken the time to actually read the thread before dropping your little pearls of wisdom in, you would have seen that fatherjohn was purely quoting an earlier exchange.
umm, yeah.
Let me give you a free tip known on this board as the first rule of holes: “When you’re in one, stop digging.”
But have a nice day!
:wally
Aha! So you admit that the points had been addressed and you lost the argument!
:wally
(By the way, Wally would be very offended at your using is smiley. Your idiocy would have led him to rip you a new one.)
fatherjohn, you failed me. SPEAK, my bitch!
Great, now he is referring to himself in the third person… :rolleyes:
It his hard keeping track of all your posts spread out over 5+ pages in each of 2 different threads, so I missed when you said that. If you want to believe that that reflects on my mental capacities somehow, whatever…
Of course, it seems to me that you are also guilty of selective reading. Let’s see…
…for me.
I dare you, I double-dare you to take this thread over to Great Debates. The problem with this thread now is that aside from maybe two dozen posters, no one bothers to check here anymore. I feel you wouldn’t last 2 posts before making a fool of yourself and reverting back to your “I know you are but what am I” type witticisms.
SCORES AGAIN!!!
I realize that this is the Pit, O He Who Lives Under a Bridge, and that you have every right to complain about what you don’t like. But people are going to disagree with you. To keep standing on the hood of your little soapbox racer car and tell people that your opinions are more valid than theirs… In real life, that would likely end up with someone shoving an epileptic lobster and a strobe light down your pants. Here, we just laugh openly while pointing.
So here you go - an argument worthy of your debating skills. If you don’t like SUVs that much, move to someplace like North Korea. Don’t have to worry about SUVs there. Don’t have to worry about personal freedoms either, but that’s O.K., right?
WOO HOO!!! HAT TRICK!!!
Oh, I would love to see father:wally take this thread over to Great Debates!
father:wally, this is how you do it. Go to the Great Debates forum and post your OP. Be sure to post a link to this thread. I’ll give you an example:
Notice that the URL to the OP is embedded in “this thread”. If you don’t know how to do that, then you can just reference http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=60487
Personally I don’t believe you have what it takes to argue your assertion in Great Debates. But I’d love to see you try.
Bonebag.
He won’t take this to GD because he’s a coward. He’s a dickless little ball of worm-ridden snot with the integrity of a puddle of toad-raping spittle. He knows that with his lack of facts, intelligence, and/or sentience, even the lowliest debater to ever cross the SDMB server would rip his mung-bait ass a new one. Since his only comeback consists of a blathering of ripped-off insults, circular logic, and ignoring all pertinent information directed towards him, he’ll last about as long as an extra-small condom wrapped over an extra-large dick.
If you wanna try to prove me wrong, Ol’ John, take your diarrhea-birthed ass over here and try scraping the layer of fat and sludge from around that ball of moldy cheese you call your brain. Who knows, you may learn something… although that may violate the laws of Physics.
Look amigo, if ask a question that’s been asked and answered on the previous page of a thread, then you risk looking like a fool. If you ask in an obnoxious manner, then somebody might call you on it. And if you don’t like it, then stay out of the “pit.”
But have a nice day!
:wally
Waaaaaaaaa…
Two whole pages of replies, and none of them from fatherbridgedewller. Go figure.
Please spare me your “bait.” Lets call a spade a spade. I crushed you in the “pit,” and you think (hope?) that you’ll do better in some other forum. Please let me inform you of a few things: First, that fatherjohn magic shines bright whereever I takes it. Second, if you look back in this thread, you’ll see that I’ve engaged in very little ad hominym attack compared to my “opponents.” Third, where else but the “pit” can I be Mr. Cynical’s “bitch”?
P.S. If you can get David B to give special permission to Mr. Cynical to pepper the thread with his little comments, I’ll be in GD before you can say “Rollover.”
You’re back, baby. Bring it on!
Now, I want you to try and say something pithy. SPEAK, bitch!
Don’t worry about it, honey. You’re my bitch everywhere.
And I say again, WHERE? Find a single fucking quote that indicates that you have refuted a single argument in this thread. Heck, I’ll sweeten the pot for you… if you can provide a cite of a single argument you refuted in this thread, I’ll go fuck a goat. Heck, I’ll give it cunnilingus, too.
That’s not magic, you idiot, that’s body odor.
An Ad Hominem attack is one that attacks a person’s character for the purpose of trying to destroy his arguments. Show us where ANYBODY, aside from you, behaved this manner.
What we DID do was “call a spade a spade” (your words, Ol’ John). You’re an idiot, so we called you an idiot. Over and over and over and over and over… your arguments were well destroyed before you even STARTED this thread, so how could we POSSIBLY undertake Ad Hominem attacks?
Spoofe, I think that someone’s stirring the waters for the sake of stirring the waters here. I’m ignoring my bitch in these threads now. Seems the only way to make him go away.
Could we maybe consider trying this again?
Pleeeeeez don’t break my heart “bitch.”
Especially after all we’ve been through together.
SPOOFE, get ready for “dolly.”
In evaluating these various cars, one needs to examine more than just danger and obstruction of visibility. By those criteria alone, a semi-trailer ought to be far more offensive than a Silly Useless Vehicle ™.
Instead one needs to weigh the positives against the negatives. By this measure, semi-trailers are far less offensive, since most semi-trailers are used to bring goods to market or otherwise transport goods.
By contrast, the vast majority of Silly Useless Vehicles are never taken off-road. Some of them have become so big and cumbersome, it would be impractical to take them off-road. Others are so yupped-out that their owners would never risk scratching the paint job of their precious LEXUS SUV off road.
If one compares the costs and the benefits, there is little question that SUV’s come out on the losing side. And this is why SUV’s suck.
Enjoy “Dolly”!