[QUOTE=Brynda]
No, I didn’t mean to rhyme, but hey, it came out nice.
In the interest of full disclosure, I was in my 40s when I met my husband here, but he was in his twenties. :eek: I point that out to say don’t be too restrictive about age. It is just a number.
[/QUOTE]
Woo-hoo! You (both) rock!
I was talking to a really great guy at a punk show last week, friend of a friend, and he mentioned in passing that he’d written a little app that would crawl MySpace for him, find girls who fit his list of specific criteria regarding age, location, & so forth, & then add them to his friends list automatically.
Well, he was a really nice guy and I probably shouldn’t have yanked his chain about this but you know, I was feeling disgruntled. Edgy, you know? Lack of sex or something.
So I asked him what exactly his pinpointed age group was. I should mention that the guy is, like, 38 or 39. He said “22 to 35” or, well, it was just over twenty and a ways under forty anyway. He looked clearly uncomfortable because a moment before, we had been discussing “ageism” (his word) and how that’s just bogus. Heh, heh, heh.
I realized several days later, as I always seem to do, what I really should have asked him:
-
What do you consider a 40-year-old male’s dating age range? and,
-
What do you consider a 40-year-old female’s dating age range?
I bet the answers would be instructive.
I’m afraid for every wonderful guy like yours, there are a hundred (at least!) guys my own age who feel it is written into law somewhere that All Men Must Have Girls 10-20 Years Younger Than They Are. Seriously, the last, say, three or four guys from my peergroup to whom I have made overtures have looked at me like I was somebody’s grandma asking them for a dance at a family wedding reception. —That’s cute, Ma’am, but you must be joking.—