All of your accusations describe the Right, not the Left. The Right is big on projection.
Shouldn’t be:
“To be fair,”
Last Try!
What a powerful rebuttal.
I’ve noticed. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
How can you dismiss anything without evidence?
When no evidence is presented in the first place.
Then how can you dismiss it?
UBL isn’t really dead. Obama keeps him locked up in the basement of the White House. The president and UBL play ping pong every Wednesday night. I have no evidence to support these claims.
Do you feel like you have to take the above seriously, or do you feel you can safely dismiss it until there’s actual proof?
Of course I don’t feel like I have to take the above seriously because you stated you have no evidence to support the above.
Right. And the only differenced between my UBL canard and Der Trih’s theory that there’s a neo-Nazi hiding behind every tree is that I’m honest about having no evidence.
And…you respond to being called an anti-Semite is to embrace it and spew the same “Jews control everything and they’re watching me!” crap?
I thought I heard vast numbers of your fellow Republicans cheering when Trump declared he’d have prisoners tortured and their families put to death, but that may have just been the laugh track.
That should be your new national anthem, by the way; a laugh track.
Good Ol’ Der Trish. Trolling again.
To the extent your recollection is correct, to which of the following would you attribute this “cheering”:
a. Inborn sadism and base desire on the part of Republicans to see people (extra points if “brown”) tortured and killed just because they like to see people tortured and killed?
b. A desire on the part of Republicans to see jihadists (primarily ISIS) of the type who saw the heads off babies, children, their mothers and non-combatant men, and who have expressed a determination to carry out attacks on the U.S., completely and utterly crushed and defeated?
Given the tone and words of your post I’m going to assume you’re afflicted with liberalism, and that the obvious answer to you is “a”. :rolleyes:
Which cannot be accomplished without murdering their families?
It’s just good to know my memory is still functional. So you ARE that worthless piece of shit then, aren’t you. It figures the guy who defended child rapers and wouldn’t shut the fuck up about it, is also a rabid Trumpy.
Fuck you.
Actually, that’s not quite fair, he was not always a “rabid Trumpy”. Earlier on, he surprised us all with his criticism and disapproval of said creature. It appears, as I noted earlier, that he has had his Come to The Donald moment, and repented his sinful ways. My suspicion is that he will approve of anyone who sticks his thumb in the eye of those he really hates, which is to say, us.
But also to be fair, he was always a piece of shit.
I, myself, have never been on board with killing jihadists’ families. In fact it was one of the key issues that caused me to retract my early support of Trump’s candidacy. But to the degree anyone was cheering Trump’s words on how to deal with Islamic jihadism, it was because they felt this was an effective way to defeat it and not because they simply wanted to see people killed and tortured.
That people can actually believe this nonsense boggles the mind. I can see how certain members of the liberal leadership might propose it as a tactic, and how certain liberals might pretend to believe it as a tactic, but to find that so many liberals really and truly believe and and to the point they become either spittle-flecked or fearful for the future of humanity would defy belief were I not seeing it with my own eyes.