Ooooh, another one. Check your PMs for some creepitude!
Meh, I took care of it already. I don’t care about gender or fuglitude. I’m a slut that way.
Creep score, based on that PM: 1/10.
Should I try again? I do restrain myself a bit, not wanting to be banned and all.
Heaven must be missing an angel, because you’ve got a sweet rack.
I didn’t type that! Someone must have stolen and hacked into my PalmPilot and forgot what a PM is.
I do have a sweet rack! Thanks 
I have 2! You mean the baking racks you cool your cookies on, right?
Which apparently we can all stare at without being ashamed!
Yes, it was pointed out. Over. And over. And over. By a poster who knew the person whose photo it was in real life and was quite put out with your duplicity. IIRC more than a month went by before you “corrected” it by sending in yet another photo of someone who wasn’t you. Surely you remember the cute little goth chick whose photo you send in to take the place of the beautiful blond you originally sent in. Somehow you always fail to mention her or her photo in these threads, preferring, in your dishonest and duplicitous way, to create the impression that you had only posted one wrong photo of yourself here.
Furthermore, if I had a morgue file or directory which somehow allowed me to include multiple photos with the same name, i.e., “self-portrait”, I’d certainly look at the photo I was about to post elsewhere to ascertain just which self-portrait it was. I can’t imagine anyone just blithely stumbling into a folder with multiple pics titled “self-portrait” and choosing one at random to post to a message board as being me.
Was this before or after the photo of the goth chick? Or did you apologize and find Arnold cool both times?
<snip>
Nope. Never happened. He has never in-listed, out-listed or enlisted my support, and I have never colluded with him to attack you over this issue or any other.
My own anti-Jain postings began after watching you continue to leave the wrong photo up for so long after having been called out on it in such a conclusive way and then turning around and posting another photo of a cuter-than-you chick to take its place, for for which you were also subsequently busted.
Still, none of that was instrumental in my subsequent posts regarding the issue. Initially I felt mere disdain for you as being someone so insecure in her own looks and so fundamentally dishonest that she felt it necessary to post not one but two phony images of herself to a message board where her looks don’t matter anyway. It was only after seeing you continue with the fiction that you’d only posted one erroneous pic, and noticing, as cashew pointed out, your propensity for joining in on pile-ons for which I felt you lacked the character to be making such condemnations that I began to call you out publicly for your dishonest and duplicitous postings. And I suspect the lone cashew’s posts which seemed to come from “left field” were similarly motivated.
So you can knock off the poor, mistreated Jain act. You are a fundamentally dishonest and duplicitous person. You were then and you continue to be so now. And the funniest thing of all is that by continuing to bring this issue up you only open the door to having your true self exposed yet again.
oh ok
Hey, messageboards are SRS BZNS.
Are we clear everyone? Posting fake photos is bad but raping children is totally kosher.
Carry on.
Starkers!! meh.
Did I miss something? Is this like SDMB-Watergate? Jesus fuck people. Get some perspective here.
Jesus titty fucking Christ. . . it’s not that serious, Starving Artist. If that whole post wasn’t over the top enough, your repeated use of “duplicitous” and “duplicity” added a whole level of ridiculous connotation to your rant. Bro, this isn’t Bush lying about there being WMDs, it’s just a chick who posted a fake picture on a message board-- take it down a notch.
Come on, people. Starving Artist brings up some important new details that everyone is very concerned about.
Er, ah…
That’s an excellent BigT impression, Starving Artist. You should take it on the road.
I literally have no idea what’s going on in this thread, but if someone’s sending out creepy PMs I’m surprised I never got one, since a large number of people assume I’m a woman based on my username. Also because the subtext to every post I’ve made on these boards in the past 12 years has been “Send me a creepy PM.”
Look, you did it again!!