Ok, let’s not get into me wanting to be a 15 year old asian girl for 20 minutes so I can walk into the girls dressing room, and sue the school if they discriminate against my identity.
You were born, with a penis or vagina, or a penis and a vagina; psychology is a completely different discussion.
What I’m making very clear, is that anytime a person with a penis has sex with a person with a vagina, the person with the penis had to be a hypocrite, because that’s the only thing women in all of human history have ever had sex with. Being bisexual does not change that fact. You are accountable in the same exact way heterosexuals are accountable, when you move into that territory.
My my my, what a limited view of sex and sexuality. You should seek professional help – seriously. It might help you better understand yourself and the world around you.
I am devoting an entire thread to making that argument, and you, unlike others, haven’t attempted to show where I’m wrong.
For example; do you agree or disagree that the only population that has ever, and for thousands of years, complained that assholes get the most sexual variety and choice is the heterosexual population?
If you agree. Then not saying this before sex, is abuse through neglect. At a minimum, you have to at least say this to not be an asshole to get sex. How many men do you think actually did that, and if they did, got sex from it? That’s a contradiction. That’s hypocrisy. Just because a guy says this, doesn’t mean they aren’t an asshole in other ways, I’m just using it to make a point.
Oh, come on… intellectual capital, intellectual resource, physical resource, reproductive resource, it’s all abstracted as resource. There are proper and improper ways to use resources, but to suggest that people who pursue sex aren’t abstracting it as a resource is weird - it sounds like a guy trying to sound PC to women; while misstating the obvious. “sex as a resource is a nefarious objectifying idea; he’s bad - you’re not really a prostitute - he’s insinuating you are - I’m good - sex is never a resource to me” etc…
Ah, it’s good to know then, that apparently by your ethics, Ilse Koch is cool, 'cause she wasn’t hoarding her pussy and freely shared it concurrently with her activities torturing and murdering the humans in her control.
Your inability to deal with reality combined with your utterly ridiculous assertions indicate that you are not capable of rational discussion, so efforts on my or any other person’s part to show you where you are wrong would be a complete and utter waste of time. Get some professional help to get your head together, and if by then you are in touch with reality, by all means come back to the SDMB for rational discussions.
And you have given us nothing, besides your personal observations taken on some fantasy trip, that you have a leg to stand on. You make nonsense statements and, when asked for any concrete evidence to support your nonsense statements, you make other nonsense statements that may or(more probably) may not have anything to do with your previous statement. You brought up this incredible hodgepodge of ethics, morals and fantasy-Show us where you are right.
Oh, and while you’re at it - could you also please explain more fully your concept of “hypocrisy”, as it seems to be a core heuristic for understanding your paradigm? TIA.
Sorry, but you’re just objectively wrong here. Sex isn’t considered a resource by, well, anyone, other than you. And it’s not really possible to make the act of having sex fit into any of the commonly accepted definitions of “resource.”
If she tortured and murdered women, then men have to intercede. Since women don’t have the complaint that bitches get the most men or sexual choice; the entire female gender is off the hook for being moral - again, the only population on earth that has this complaint, is heterosexual men.
Everyone knows this.
I’m explaining why heterosexual men are saying this, why they’ve been saying it for thousands of years. Hypocrisy is an act of aggression; and hypocrisy is the only thing that gets heterosexual men laid.
I don’t agree. Not sure how anyone could know with any accuracy the most common complaints about sex in the last 100 years, much less the last several thousand years.
It specifically is about who ends up with women sexually. That’s the context of the phrase. It’s about heterosexual sex. The phrase is not used for any other population.
As men have been beginning to clarify this; there has been an equal movement to rationalize biology arguments for fitness; and that this phrase is wrong.
I’m engaging this discussion in the affirmative of that phrase.
