I actually want to quote on this, though not the board or the moderation (ya’ll know where ATMB is).
I was born in 1974 - so I was 13 (!) when Ronald Reagan finally started a very public dialog on AIDS (early days yet in understanding, but acknowledging it wasn’t JUST a problem for THOSE people). Thus my formative years were not puritanical, but also very unadventurous.
So, yeah, we’re evolving. We’re ALWAYS evolving our sexual mores, as the pendulum springs and biology, culture, scientific advances et al offer freedoms or risks that were previously unknown.
Back to the thread:
I asked my wife about her similar experiences - she mentioned one from several years back. Now, this is tropetastic, because we always talk about “Oh, you just haven’t had XYZ the right way” or “poor quality XYZ” in Cafe Society. So now 20ish years ago, a friend wanted her to try some “good” fish, because she always loathed it (and of course, these days she doesn’t eat meat at all, because she doesn’t like the taste).
So he (a quite good amateur cook) made some lovely handmade tuna nigiri. He has all the right skills, and it was exquisite (should be, since we paid around $40/lb for the fish), so it was quite fresh, well grained, and not at all fishy smelling.
She (being a good sport) tried it. And in her words, while it was absolutely perfect and lovely in terms of texture, smooth and buttery, it still tasted like catfood to her.
[ no harm, more for the two of us ]
But it’s right back to the taste component. Something can be of the highest quality, perfect freshness, and spoken of it hushed tones. But if it isn’t to your tastes, it’s always going to be a disappointment.