They are hiding behind the first amendment. The government is allowed to prohibit speech inciting imminent lawless action. It has to be imminent action. Telling someone he might end up dead doesn’t fall under this category.
Courts have dealt with this exact same issue before with other extremist groups and have held that the language was protected by the first amendment.
If the website could get away with it they would probably call for direct violence.
I agree, I just thing adding the locations though to the post just drives the message home further and certainly adds way more pressure for a company or even MS&TP to certainly censor the episodes or at least give it a 2nd thought.
Quote:
**“This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality of what will likely happen to them,” **it added.
Is this like when I punch my sister while yelling “I’m not punching you! I’m not punching you!”?
Priceless. And:
Quote:
** "We're the religion of peace and we'll kill anyone who disagrees." **
Beyond compare. Except with …
…** “I do not like this word bomb. It is not a bomb; it is a device which is exploding.”
** Jacques LeBlanc
French ambassador to New Zealand/Aotearoa
Plus sadly I live in the UK where freedom of speech is not protected by the constitution and is being steadily eroded by the reactionary forces of PC and government reaction to radical islam.
Rubbish. I saw the episode earlier in the week on CC in the UK and, apart from one ‘censored’ bar (which I wondered too whether that was part of the joke) it was entirely uncut.
The SO wanted to watch something else at the time episode 201 would orignally air. So, I look at the Dish guide…it replays later…no problem.
I then later that night go to watch it rerun. The DVR says its episode 201, but it aint. And the DVR says the one after THAT is supposed to be episode 201. It isnt either.
I guess comedy central pussed out and caved as soon as possible.
That doesn’t necessarily prove that the episode was written in “censored” form – Stone and Parker might have anticipated that CC would chicken out and made sure the episode would work either way.
I love this idea. It’ll get the crazies to shut up and we can have more episodes of the Super Best Friends. I’d love it if the SBF said something like, “You know Moe if you can’t play nice and you can’t keep your followers from issueing death threats then we know longer want to be your friend.”
Maybe they could replace Moe with L. Ron Hubbard and then they could have all the SBF making fun of LRH instead of [del]Semen[/del] Seaman. Then [del]Semen[/del] Seaman can say something about how it’s nice not to be the butt of the jokes anymore and he can totally just go off making fun of LRH.
Moe can counter that it’s not his fault. He has always insisted his followers adhere to the principles of peace under the severest of penalties but somehow they’ve blown that all out of proportion. All the while his character is invisible which leads to the other super friends complaining about how annoying THAT is. Talking to him is like talking to a wall.
Seems like lots of opportunities to turn this into a teaching moment.
They were pretty easily available online at the time of the controversy. I’ve seen the twelve real cartoons (and we’ll get to why that’s relevant in a moment). Only two, as far as I remember, actually addressed what was supposed to be the original problem: an author had claimed he couldn’t get anyone to do the illustrations for a children’s book on Mohammed. So two of the cartoons, if memory serves, were drawings of Mohammed suitable for a children’s book. A few of the others mocked the controversy, for instance one showed ten-year-old Mohammed from class 4B - just an ordinary boy who happened to have that name, which after all is very common for Muslim boys. The others? Yeah. Stupid. Also intentionally provoking, in a stupid way - e.g. the infamous bomb-in-the-turban cartoon. I’d like to think that this is because the decent Danish editorial cartoonists just rolled their eyes at the invitation and went on to more interesting projects.
On the other hand, the people who were out to stir up trouble with these cartoons added some additional pictures to the pamphlet they published and passed around to get people angry. One was a photo from a French small-town newspaper showing the man who had won a local hog-calling contest. He had dressed up with a fake pig nose and fake pig ears, and in context the photo was just a bit goofy. But these [redacted]s intentionally removed the real caption and said it was a drawing of Mohammed as a pig :mad:
I still don’t get it. 200, at least, had to have been specifically written with the censorship in mind. When Mohammed is covered with the censor bar, they even mention it. They make a big deal out of how the guy cannot appear “in South Park.” It’s meta, and only works as meta.
Surely only the bleeping was done by them. I wish I’d seen it. I always watch it online, now.
Well, at least it’s kept people from spoiling me on who Cartman’s father is (assuming that wasn’t bleeped, too. That would have been hilarious.)
Apparently the blogger who posted the threats is a 20 year-old who lives in Virginia in his mom’s house with his brother, wife and son. He was a malcontent in high school, then he converted, married a Muslim woman and had a son. (Way to overdo it on the conversion, dude!)