Did SA give a clear opinion about whether Sandusky himself is indeed a child sex abuser?
Member warning
If anyone bumps that** Paterno thread **, I’m seriously going to send a gopher to your garden this spring. Maybe two.
/Member warning
Given that you fancy yourself a reliable predictor of a person’s behavior based on who they choose to defend, up to and including the assumption that they’re likely to be rapists, I’m surprised you have to ask.
Starving Artist is gross. I’m barely even on the SDMB lately but I felt it was important to let my opinion be known on this.
Gross. He is just gross. I highly recommend y’all put him on ignore and keep him there.
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10164048&postcount=91
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15827127&postcount=782
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=12251373&postcount=823
Bolding mine in each case.
Ah, another old enemy makes an appearance.
And your opinion should be of significance…why?
[QUOTE=Starving Artist]
What the hell do you think I have to regret? By sticking to the facts I almost single-handedly debunked all the ridiculous claims being made about Joe Paterno and Woody Allen and left the members of their respective lynch mobs sputtering in defeat.
[/QUOTE]
Sputtering in disbelief, maybe. Dude, if large numbers of people choose to disengage with you entirely, it’s not a sign of victory.
- Not sure you’re using the word “assumption” correctly there.
- Thanks for providing the link so that it will be clear to everyone that I said nothing that implies I can predict people’s behavior based on who they choose to defend. (“How they choose to defend a person from what charges in what context” would be closer.)
- Do you think Sandusky engaged in acts with children that should rightly have put him in jail?
If I remember Starving’s position correctly, he believes that Sandusky did commit the acts for which he was convicted, but did nothing wrong in the instance that was seen and reported to Paterno.
I note that nowhere do I say anything remotely as stupid as that blacks got the bends because whites gave them their rights too quickly.
The points I made were good and valid and I’m glad you brought them up. I understand that inconvenient truths are nettlesome to you.
Incorrect. Once enough information had come out to show a history of child abuse on Sandusky’s part I came to believe that he was misbehaving sexually with the boy but not raping him.
No shit, genius. The bends was my characterization of your stupidity. Your claim has always been that black people would have been better off getting civil rights more slowly and incrementally. Do you still deny this? There is lots more evidence to prove you did.
I did forget that you blame liberals for the fact that this didn’t happen in the slow and incremental way you think it should have.
You do know what the bends are, don’t you?
What evidence is there that he has a history of child abuse?
I wasn’t aware of any evidence other than the children’s having come forward and told the stories about it. Was there other evidence I wasn’t aware of?
It’s a sign of victory when virtually every hysterical claim made about Joe Paterno is proven to be false and those who originally claimed otherwise are left holding an empty sack. Which is exactly what happened. If they chose to disengage with me (although some like Bryan Ekers held out till the very end simply for trolling purposes) it was because their allegations were proven to have no merit.
I think SA gets off on talking about pedophiles and pedophilia and you all are just feeding into it. Again, gross.
(emph mine)
I was thinking along those lines when I read your post. Except I was going post something like DNFTT. But I think we’re in the same ballpark.
Yes. There were times, dates and places mentioned, parent complaints, and police involvement. And the complaints were brought up at the time and not in a vague manner thirty, forty and fifty years after the fact.
None of which is the case with Cosby’s accusers, although I’ll grant that one wouldn’t ordinarily expect parental involvement in the case of Cosby.
Hahahaha…no, you insipid moron. They keep bringing it up, and in dishonest ways, so I’m compelled to set the record straight. I rarely bring up the Paterno thread, and on the occasions when I have it’s merely been in reference to the hysterical mob mentality at work there. The same sort we’ve seen with Woody Allen and now with Bill Cosby, as a matter of fact, where people don’t want to hear facts or the truth and react to both by making accusations of rape, pedophilia, etc. on the part of whoever is trying to bring them into the discussion – you know, like you and Frylock have done here.
Okay, kids, this has been fun and all but like I said, I just don’t have the time to play here that I used to have, so you’re going to have to excuse me for a while.
Wait for it…