Shrug, he’s a piece of shit. He flat out admits that back in his youth he and his friends would try to rape women and it wasn’t a big deal. He throws in some weird shit about American Indians holding him at knife point and how he turned out fine (as if) and then he breaks out Clinton.
I love how he gets to decide for the poor wimmin what we should be upset by.
Thank god we have him to tell me that the guy who fondled me when I was 12 didn’t really upset me. It’s just the Democrats back in 1980 told me I was upset. Silly me!
What a horrible person.
“Well…they did it tooo!!!”
:rolleyes:
No, you hysterical idiot! I’m saying that this particular case of attempted rape, if it even occurred, was not that bad.
There’s considerable difference between saying this case isn’t that bad vs. every case of attempted rape isn’t that bad.
Hopefully someone will hand you a box of tissues and enough Valium that you might possibly try to dry your eyes and calm down enough to at least recognize such distinctions exist.
Prior to my discovery of this board I used to think the hysterical nutjobbery coming from the left was just for show and that no one could really believe all that shit. It’s been eye-opening to say the least to learn that yes, it’s sincere, and you people really are that bad.
What’s funny is that my Facebook page has been lit up the last few days with posts and lampooning images of women my age making fun of and criticizing the big deal being made over Ford’s accusations. These are the same women who back in the day could have handled a drunken, overly zealous man with no problem and then gotten on with their lives like nothing happened…because basically it didn’t. And they’re laughing at and making fun of you!
Grow up, the lot of you!
YOU DONT GET TO DECIDE.
The victim gets to decide how bad an attempted rape is. Jesus Christ, you’re the epitome of the arrogant patronizing male.
You actually think your opinion matters more. Christ.
Why is it so fucking important to you that women be able to shake this crap off like it was no big deal? It is a big deal and always has been. The reason women shook it off was because they had little choice. We don’t have to put up with that crap anymore. So sorry that bothers you.
Go ahead guys, give Sentient Dingleberry ten pages of oxygen. He’s masturbating like a motherfucker right now.
Not me. This scum gets nothing more from me.
I will mail you a check for $100 if you can prove I told you not to be upset at the abuse you experienced when you were 12.
I will mail you another check for $100 if you can prove I ever said I was entitled to decide for women what they should be upset by.
I’ll keep my headphones handy to block out the crickets.
100% of this is in your imagination.
I said why in the other thread: it makes them strong and it relieves them of a lifetime spent self-identifying as a victim.
I’d be most happy if women were to DECIDE they’re not going to allow themselves to buy into the victimhood dogma constantly being promoted by the left and to put the wrongs others do to them in the past where it belongs and live a happy life instead.
That strategy is indistinguishable from one of simply allowing men to do what they want to women without consequence.
If that’s what you mean, why didn’t you just say “men should be able to do what they want to women without consequence”?
You’d be better off if you’d shut the fuck up.
ETA Starving Artist, I mean.
Don’t be an idiot. We have laws on the books for the very purpose of discouraging and punishing wrongful behavior.
Let the law take its course in the event of attempted rape or actual rape just like it does when you get robbed or stabbed or beaten. And then just like you do if you get robbed or stabbed or beaten, you let the law take its course and get on with your life, free of the stigma (hopefully anyway, I am dealing with lefties here) and psychological impact of going through the rest of your life thinking of yourself primarily as a victim!
Wow; you’re both tedious and stupid.
Hey, you know what’s really good? Burritos!
Don’t forget to ask the burrito guy for guacamole. And it’s better if he puts it inside the burrito, rather than giving it to you on the side.
Why? What exactly have I said - in actual words as opposed to in your fevered imagination - that is so bad?
Is it that I said there are degrees of seriousness that exist regarding sexually related crimes?
Is it that I said people would be better off to put the bad things that happen to them in the past and get on with their lives free from the stigma of victimhood?
Is it that I offered $100 to someone to prove the accusations they made about me were true?
Is it that I called BigT and idiot? (oh, wait, it can’t be that. Everyone calls him an idiot)
Frankly, I’m not seeing much bad here. Would you care perhaps to elucidate?
See, although Starving Artist is indeed constantly complaining that women’s objections to sexual assault and harassment are just “victimhood dogma” and useless “whinging”, he never told IvoryTowerDenizen specifically not to be upset about that particular instance of sexual assault, so in his mind he’s off the hook.
Starving Artist has never struck me as that type. He gets genuinely angry in these threads, not gleeful. It clearly causes him distress.
But, even if it didn’t, why the fuck should that matter? Should I have just ignored him when he practically admitted to attempting to rape women, or at least staying silent while his friends did so?
That said, I do think we shouldn’t give him room to argue distractions. He’s going to try and fight his way out of this. But there is no escape here. He claimed personal knowledge that attempted rapes were going on at parties when he was a “youth.”
The subject of this thread is how he does not think attempted rape is all that bad a thing. The only arguments I want to see from him are him struggling to paper towel his way out of it.
No, actually I think I’m off the hook for the very reason that I didn’t say what she claimed I said.
Isn’t this what the Kavanaugh women did? They put it behind them and moved on to a happy life.
And it was only when he was up for a public position that demands high moral character, that they stood up, instead of buying into the victim hood mentality that says that they have no reason to talk.
These women are not behaving like victims. Far from it. What bothers you appears to be their authority, and their exercise of the power their authority brings.
As you’ll see from the above quote, I’m not at all disagreeing with you on this level of very literal interpretation.
Whether or not your repeated remarks about alleged “victimhood” as sampled in my previous post convey an overall message of arrogantly telling women not to get upset about abuse in general is something we probably would disagree on, though.