There was a second trial?
Now would be a good time to start campaigning for a change to the relevant Florida Statutes.
Yep, ignore the findings of the jury. He was found innocent, but lets try to destroy his life because we don’t like the verdict. It never fails, there is no hate like liberal Hate.
And we wish you luck!
Instead of getting help for her troubled son, Sabrina kicked him out of the house, and the father wasn’t much better. Trayvon’s blood is on their hands. George Zimmerman just pulled the trigger.
If you have followed the case objectively and considered the availiable evidence there was really only one conclusion you could draw. Unfortunately, you came to the wrong one.
:rolleyes: The Right is a seething mass of bigotry and hatred. And members of the Right threaten to murder people on a regular basis, and occasionally do so.
If anyone could have claimed self defense, it was Martin, not the guy with the gun who was literally recorded pursuing an unarmed man for no reason.
Between this and BobLibDem, I can’t waaaaait to cross the aisle.
No, no, no! An unarmed CHILD.
And the khakis. Won’t please someone consider the khakis!
Yawn… :rolleyes:
That’s not what the evidence in the case showed, though. That’s your attempt to presentation very slanted view of the evidence.
Why not?
Is there a political, racial, ethnic, socio-economic, religious, or sexual group of which that is not true?
I think you’ve mistaken me for someone who feels a travesty of justice just occurred.
I’m not all that found of rescinding DTR clauses. But thankfully since the states do have some rights left, where I live it is still the law of the land.
Surprisingly I have not yet seen a single report of CCW holder murdered while retreating. :-/
Now some clean-up needs to be done.
The State’s Attorney Office fired Ben Kruidbos. He was the IT guy responsible for pulling photos from Martin’s phone.
He did so, and turned over more than 4,000 items from the phone to his bosses.
He was alarmed when he later learned that they had turned over only 2,900 items to the defense. He feared that if the defense discovered the fact that photos were held back, he would become the scapegoat, with prosecutors claiming that he was the one who failed to provide photos. So he retained his own lawyer, and on that lawyer’s advice approached first his bosses, and then the judge, to reveal the existence of the photos. Judge Nelson ultimately ordered the state to provide those photos to the defense.
For this act he was placed on leave, and the moment the case went to the jury, he was fired.
His lawyer intends to sue, claiming the protections of the state’s expansive whistleblower act.
Perhaps someone wants to argue the state’s side?
No, no, no…I was agreeing with your post and wishing BobLibDem luck.
The defence lawyer said that they would be applying for immunity from a civil suit, so it can’t be automatic.
George Zimmerman is entitled to have an SYG hearing.
It was a travesty that George Zimmerman was even charged with a crime with what little evidence the prosecution had. George Zimmerman had the right to use deadly force and sad as it is, Trayvon Martin’s actions lead to his own death.