Stuck Between A Rock and BLM

Coincidentally, I joined in 2009. :slight_smile:
(And I accept fully my admonishment, BTW)

At this point it’s quite clear that BLM agreed to take part in the Pride parade in order to get a national stage for their protest, so I find this assertion extremely dubious.

To be clear, it was only a half-hour because the Pride organizers caved to their demands as quickly as they could.

:confused: What “assertion” do you find “extremely dubious”? The claim that BLM was invited and agreed to march as the “Honored Group” in the Toronto Pride parade? That appears to be documented fact.

And why would that be surprising? After all, BLM in Toronto and elsewhere has significant leadership representation among self-identified queer and trans people of color, as this 2015 article notes:

Such leaders include Janaya Khan, co-founder of BLM Toronto and one of the organizers of this year’s Toronto Pride parade BLM sit-in:

You seem to be assuming a clear disjunction between LGBTQ people who rightfully “own” Pride events and BLM participants who merely “agree to take part” in Pride events “in order to get a national stage for their protest” (as though BLM doesn’t have plenty of “national stages” for its protests already).

The actual intersectionality, to coin a phrase, of Pride and BLM appears to be much more complex than you’re assuming.

But Stringbean is an idiot, so it makes a sort of sense.

BLM hijacking a gay pride parade and spreading their anti-cop bigotry and making it all about them right after the mass anti-gay terror attack in Florida is spectacularly bad timing.

The assertion that I find dubious is that BLM accepted the invitation to participate in the Pride parade out of a desire to celebrate the LGBTQ community instead of a cynical grab for attention.

Where in this thread was any such assertion made?

Ya know, there IS such a thing as black gay people…

Yep. 2009.

By the way, nobody seems to have commented on the fact that two days previously, the annual Trans March took place as part of the multi-day Toronto Pride festivities.

Guess who led it?

Any guesses as to what group was also involved with the Dyke March?

The popular narrative about this event seems to be that the gay people organizing Toronto Pride, out of the goodness of their hearts and misguided liberal idealism, kindly offered to let the black people in BLM join in “their” parade as a gesture of cross-movement solidarity. And then BLM selfishly and ungratefully trampled on the “favor” shown them by demanding attention and subservience to “their” movement to “make it all about them”.

But based on additional info such as this April 2016 article, I’m not convinced that that narrative is accurate.

Thanks **Kimstu **.

Most welcome. :slight_smile:

Well put.

But there’s not much “we” happening when marginalized outgroups start to think of oppression and liberation as zero-sum phenomena in which only the most out of outgroups is pure enough to be Not Guilty of Possessing Privilege (translation: there’s only enough liberation to go around to the most deserving marginalized people), and where oppression is considered to benefit oppressors hence, no, if anyone can be shown to be a beneficiary of any form of categorical oppression, they are BAD and part of the PROBLEM.

The thing you interrupt with your protest is the de facto thing you are protesting. They held up the parade, which was not the intent of those organizing it. They made demands of the parade organizers. They made themselves separate by choosing to protest.

The narrative is that they made it about them because they did make it about them. If it was about the LGBT community, it wouldn’t have been a protest against their parade. The only way for it to be otherwise is if they were secretly representing the LGBT community.

Yeah, great. They did a couple other parades without this bullshit. Which message are people going to remember?