[QUOTE=Carol Stream]
Are you refuting the fact that her responses tended toward “I don’t recall”?
[/QUOTE]
Hey Carol. Has it ever once crossed your mind that Hillary answered in that way to questions regarding the work she had done on minor legal issues years earlier because she actually could not recall? I didn’t think so.
[QUOTE=Frostillicus]
Hey Carol. Has it ever once crossed your mind that Hillary answered in that way to questions regarding the work she had done on minor legal issues years earlier because she actually could not recall? I didn’t think so.
[/QUOTE]
Hey Frosti, has it ever once crossed your mind that Hillary answered in that way because she had something to hide? I didn’t think so.
Hey, Carol, has it ever crossed your mind that nobody gives a rat’s ass about your bot-spews? I didn’t think so.
[QUOTE=Biggirl]
Are you refuting the fact that Cheney has lied and continues to lie to the American people?
Because if you aren’t, perhaps you should start your own “HRC doesn’t recall” thread. I mean, instead of jumping up and down in this one yelling, “Look at me! Look at me! Don’t look at our lying Vice Prez! Look over here at me!”
[/QUOTE]
Aw, cut the poor baby some slack, willya? It’s getting kinda lonely out there on the looney fringe. Lotsa ordinary folk drifting away, refusing to gobble up any more of the premasticated red meat, flipping to another station, stuff like that. A demagogue watching the demos slip away can get desperate, you know?
[QUOTE=EddyTeddyFreddy]
Hey, Carol, has it ever crossed your mind that nobody gives a rat’s ass about your bot-spews? I didn’t think so.
[/QUOTE]
Hey, Dipshit, has it ever crossed your mind that nobody in the real world gives a rat’s ass about the loony lefty ideas that are regularly posted here?
This place is like a circle-jerk, but with recipes and threads about kittens. Lame.
[QUOTE=Carol Stream]
Hey, Dipshit, has it ever crossed your mind that nobody in the real world gives a rat’s ass about the loony lefty ideas that are regularly posted here?
[/Quote]
Yeah, there are plenty of folks here who basically treat this place as a billboard for political advertising, and it’s full to overflowing with useless political pissing matches. Now you’ve wasted a bunch of space for no useful purpose as well. Good job.
Well, if we’re talking lame, utter non sequiters concerning Hillary Clinton in a thread that doesn’t have the slightest thing to do with her is pretty much the taxtbook definition of the word.
If you feel, as you apparently do, that there is no value added here, you might want to ask yourself what the point is of having taken the time to drop your little series of turds into this thread.
[sub](fixed coding. – Uke)[/sub]
[QUOTE=Carol Stream]
Hey, Dipshit, has it ever crossed your mind that nobody in the real world gives a rat’s ass about the loony lefty ideas that are regularly posted here?
This place is like a circle-jerk, but with recipes and threads about kittens. Lame.
[/QUOTE]
You know, I bet if you offered to never to post here again, a bunch of Dopers would be more than happy to refund your money.
[QUOTE=elucidator]
.
You gotta wonder when the tipping point becomes the boiling point, a angry mobs of peasants march on the WH with torches and pitchforks… Serfs Up!
[/QUOTE]
Gas prices are going down, right?
Your answer is never.
-Joe
[QUOTE=Carol Stream]
Senator Clinton’s favorite response during the Whitewater hullaballo seems to have been “I don’t recall”.
Like those missing Rose Law Firm docs that were “found” in the Residence.
Senator Clinton was also peripherally involved in President Nixon’s impeachment hearings, so it follows that she learned the value of “I don’t recall” at that time.
[/QUOTE]
Oliver North also said “I don’t recall” during the Iran-Contra hearings. What do you make of that?
[QUOTE=Rilchiam]
Oliver North also said “I don’t recall” during the Iran-Contra hearings. What do you make of that?
[/QUOTE]
A patriot! A true American! Defending his president even against an obviously Communist-tainted Congress! Give the man a political office!
Sorry…I think 1980s-era Berke Breathed just took over my hands…
[QUOTE=El_Kabong]
Well, if we’re talking lame, utter non sequiters concerning Hillary Clinton in a thread that doesn’t have the slightest thing to do with her is pretty much the taxtbook definition of the word.
[/QUOTE]
Under your definition, the OP itself was a non sequitur, in that Richard Nixon has nothing to do with Secretary Rice.
Why didn’t you call out elucidator for posting irrelevant "turds"in his OP?
[QUOTE=Carol Stream]
Under your definition, the OP itself was a non sequitur, in that Richard Nixon has nothing to do with Secretary Rice.
Why didn’t you call out elucidator for posting irrelevant "turds"in his OP?
[/QUOTE]
LOOK AT ME! I SAID “TURDS!” PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE SUBSTANCE OF THE OP! ONLY PAY ATTENTION TO ME!!!
[QUOTE=Carol Stream]
Hey Frosti, has it ever once crossed your mind that Hillary answered in that way because she had something to hide? I didn’t think so.
[/QUOTE]
Ouch! :rolleyes:
But what all you people attacking Cheney are ignoring is that TED KENNEDY MURDERED MARY JO KPOECHNE!!!
[QUOTE=Rilchiam]
Oliver North also said “I don’t recall” during the Iran-Contra hearings. What do you make of that?
[/QUOTE]
Fawn Hall was hawt!!! 
[QUOTE=Tuckerfan]
Crikey! I’m a mere pup of 37 and my numbers aren’t that low! What’s your secret, Dave?
[/QUOTE]
Don’t let attacks on you by diembodied, anonymous voices from cyberspace bother you.
Have an episode of rapid pulse reate, go to the hospital in Bakersfield by helicopter and end up taking 4 pills a day for arhythmia.
That’s the secret.
It was so hard to listen to Chenery sit there and suavely say things along the lines of - No, there were no WMD but Saddam had the potential … and like Well, there was a meeting in Prague … and know that there were roughly 40% of poll respondants who actually believed him.
Reading through the transcript, this jumped out at me:
Um, I was under the impression that one reason oil was so high was this administrations hugely moronic, destructive middle east policy, with Iraq being the centerpeice. Is this a supremely idiotic thing for Cheney to say, or am I missing something?
Bush on Saddam and Zarqawi today:
Part of the reason being a ‘nonoperational relationship’, whatever that may be? This is very confusing.
Wait a minute; the definition of being a “state sponser of terrorism” has been downgraded to having a terrorist living in a country you’re running? Weren’t all those al Qaida terrorists living in the United States for months before September 11th?
[QUOTE=Don’t Call Me Shirley]
Um, I was under the impression that one reason oil was so high was this administrations hugely moronic, destructive middle east policy, with Iraq being the centerpeice. Is this a supremely idiotic thing for Cheney to say, or am I missing something?
[/QUOTE]
“Moronic”? “Destructive”? Surely you jest. It’s been very constructive for the stock portfolios of rich people with oil holdings.
Like, oh, Dick Cheney.