Tamerlane

[wring]

@The Flying Dutchman

Now try and find a cite where I started a pit thread of an unaccomplished idiot.

have you pittted yourself lately?

[Czarcasm]

@The Flying Dutchman

Now try and find a cite where I started a pit thread of an unaccomplished idiot.

Hey, Liberal, if I weren’t a gentleman…

[Liberal]

Wait! Wait! I haven’t finished my analysis!

[The_Flying_Dutchman]

@Czarcasm

Hey, Liberal, if I weren’t a gentleman…

I didn’t bring ** Lib** to the pit, you did.

[Frank]

@The Flying Dutchman

I didn’t bring ** Lib** to the pit, you did.

Liberal

Are you OK?

[Czarcasm]

@The Flying Dutchman

I didn’t bring ** Lib** to the pit, you did.

If I recall correctly, you pitted him-I merely moved your weakly disguised pitting to the proper forum.

[Tamerlane]

@The Flying Dutchman

Thankyou for the clarification
I’m sorry if I harmed you in any way
I’m sorry that I suggested that you gratuitously inferred that I was being macho. You had good reason.
Anything else

Okay, fine. We’ll leave it at that.

[Shodan]

I still say you use the images and representations of professional golf tournaments without the express written permission of the PGA.

Regards,
Shodan

[Malthus]

Tamerlane is well worth the pitting. Rebelling against the Jats is one thing; but there is no excuse for that whole “making towers out of human skulls” thing. :mad:

[EddyTeddyFreddy]

@Malthus

Tamerlane is well worth the pitting. Rebelling against the Jats is one thing; but there is no excuse for that whole “making towers out of human skulls” thing. :mad:

Hey! What’s wrong with recycling, huh?

[Malthus]

@EddyTeddyFreddy

Hey! What’s wrong with recycling, huh?

So that’s what happens when you don’t put your cardboard in the correct container? :eek:

Environmentalism just got outta hand.

[EddyTeddyFreddy]

Hey, Malthus, I’m really getting a kick out of seeing your username coupled with the content of your last two posts here.

[Malthus]

@EddyTeddyFreddy

Hey, Malthus, I’m really getting a kick out of seeing your username coupled with the content of your last two posts here.

Soon my posts will multiply and outstrip my supply of readers.

[Colibri]

@The Flying Dutchman

The only reason that prompted me to reply in this thread is that I really owe you an appology. I ask you to accept that the editing of that post was not intentional to deceive. My attempt was to focus. I was clearly wrong. Upon re reading your post I had to ask myself “what the hell was I thinking?”.

So Colibri I am truly sorry about that post. I was wrong.

Thanks for the apology. And I’m glad to see that you have offered Tamerlane an apology (more or less). (But I also hope you never pit me out of “respect.” It’s never a good thing to be pitted, even mistakenly or out of “respect.”)

However, I do think you need to examine “what the the hell you were thinking.” First, you misinterpreted **Tamerlane’s ** comment, put the worst possible spin on it, and took offense at it; then you edited my comment in a way that changed its meaning, and took offense at that.

I’ll take you on your word that your intent was not to deceive others; but you were certainly deceiving yourself as to what both Tamerlane and I were actually saying. You seem to be undertaking some self-analysis; I hope you can find out why you are so quick to take offense.

As I said before, you seem to be highly concerned that people “respect” you, but don’t seem to understand how to go about gaining it. Certainly pitting a poster like Tamerlane is not the way to go about it, not unless the offense is something major and you are absolutely sure you are in the right.

[Liberal]

Colibri is absolutely correct. Even someone with the status of Wally M (which was nearly godlike) can be put in place when the assailant is right.