This brings to mind one of the medieval tests for witchcraft, which entailed stuffing the woman into a sack and tossing her into a nearby pond. If she floated, she was guilty and hanged; if she sank, she was a) innocent, and b) drowned.
A paraplegic man certainly can engage in sexual activity of either oral or manual nature.
Also, you shouldn’t assume that a paraplegic man is unable to get an erection or engage in penis-insertion sex - many can’t, but also many can. Spinal cord injury can be capricious and the details differ from case to case. Without naming names, we had a very active Doper post-spinal injury who was very clear on the facts that while his legs no longer worked his dick certainly still did. Even in men post-injury who no longer have full sexual function it’s going out on a limb to assume they have NO sexual life of any sort, or that they are unable to achieve some sort of satisfaction and pleasure from what they are able to do.
The problem of incels is not simply a lack of sex, it’s also a lack of being able to form any meaningful sort of relationship with a female of the species. Men unable to function sexually often still can have meaningful relationships with women. I’ve known of at least one elderly couple who married and lived happily together despite the man being unable to function sexually. Being able to have sex is better than not being able to do so, but it’s not a simple lack of sexual intercourse that results in the toxicity of what we currently calls “incels”.
Governor Abbott is still married to the woman he married three years before his accident. Presumably, they still have a meaningful relationship. Regardless of whether or not Abbott is able to engage in particular sexual acts I would not describe him as an “incel”.
And about time, I say. Have you looked into that other guy? I was shocked to learn he was from the Middle East, and pretty dusky-hued. And he keeps going on and on about helping the poors, rather than donating to Kenneth Copeland and Joyce Meyer like a good Christian.