Perversely glad to hear more than GK described was involved.
Actually that’s why once they severed the business relationship they could no longer offer the online archives, not why they severed the business relationship.
Also “glad” to see there is at least some (unspecified) allegation of more than touching of the back now alleged. Have to admit that I don’t get why it took MPR something like seven weeks to share that and why they are being so coy as what those unnamed alleged “sexually inappropriate incidents” might be. The explanation for not being more specific as to what he is accused of doing (without naming or identifying the reputed victim) seems a bit weak, but again, at least they acted on an allegation of presumptively more substance.
Gee, now I sort of feel like commending every legal counsel involved in this one for how they’ve kept the parties from babbling all over the place and contained the leakage of lurid details for so long.
(Maybe it’s some of that taciturn Minnesota country Lutheran thing…
)