A writer for High Country News (not a drug-related periodical), Hal Herring, a Montana immigrant from the south who likes guns and is wary of big government, offers an in-depth-ish look at the occupation from the perspective of one who can identify with the militants but disagrees strongly with their goals and the realistic prospective outcome. Nicely written, even-handed essay.
I have a very strong suspicion that in the 18th or 19th century, their threats and gun waving would have just gotten them a quick trip to Boot Hill… if they ever got the gumption to actually threaten an armed person :dubious:
One of the highlights of this article for me was the photo of one of the cars at the reserve with professional-quality decals on it advertising the services of doctors who will remove the government-implanted microchips that they secretly installed into those born after 1980.
Well yes, they are counting on that under 21st century ROE other people won’t shoot first and will have to let them just walk on to take the high ground.
I thought the point of the article was that the cattle aren’t being cared for properly, and Bundy is an absentee rancher. Cattle, left to their own, get in trouble. They get injuries which need a Vet’s attention. They get lost. They get trapped in thick brambles. They have difficulty calving.
Cattle, reduced to a state of nature, die in large numbers (just as humans would.) It’s staggeringly bad husbandry to just leave them alone and let them make their own way. No responsible cattle rancher would countenance that kind of malfeasance.
I gathered that evidence shows he is not a rancher.
He merely let some cows go onto public lands many years ago, and now he occasionally goes onto the public lands to effectively hunt these (now) wild cattle.
Trouble is, he thinks he owns these wild cattle that are roaming on public lands, and he thinks the public lands are now his, because he harvests wild cattle on them.