The Bundys are at it again.

There are several different movements like this that all think they have found a legal way to take property, not pay taxes, etc.

I feel bad for their tenant.

And if I’m a marketing guy for the bank that owns the home, I’m really busy finding that poor child a place to live (and ideally some sort of job/child care assistance). Cynical, I know, but that kind of stuff is marketing gold.

With that said, hopefully someone is helping the girl.

If there’s a banker with a heart of gold, it’s because he repossessed it.

:smiley:

Well, some state statutes provide for a tort of “civil theft.” E.g., if your insurance company mistakenly cuts you a check for twice the amount they owed you, and you know you are not entitled to the extra money but keep it anyway, and the company notices what happened, they can sue you and recover three times the amount – “treble damages”. What you did is not a crime because you did not steal the money, the company put it in your hand, like Uncle Billy putting the money in Mr. Potter’s hand in It’s a Wonderful Life.

Cliven Bundy’s cattle are starving.

Quite.

The Bundy coterie made a mockery of their arraignments in federal court in Las Vegas yesterday, refusing to enter pleas and demanding that all of the charges against them be read out, taking 90 minutes.

Forget Rick, it’s Galt Ranch.

Not sure it was the court that was made a mockery

Ooh! They should have a “The Other Shoe” Community Chest card in Monopoly! You drop it on someone when they pull the “Bank Error in Your Favor Collect $200” card, and then they have to pay $600!

They needed Dan to help with the reading:

That has to be fake. Look at those pictures. The Courier just pasted in the faces from Natural Born Killers.

And apparently his anti-gubmint buddies are doing their utmost to keep it that way.

Would they need a court order just to shoot them?

In fact, it occurs to me – since they are not Bundy’s property and not a protected species, anybody could legally shoot them – or round them up and take them to a better ranch. They’re state property and the state won’t squawk.

Given the situation, one might argue that they are an invasive species. Cattle are not native to the US, and the ones that are here are almost entirely kept under control, to a reasonable extent. Eradicating invasive nuisance pests is a public service.

And in this case arguably more humane than letting them starve.

Not Bundy-related, but sovcit related (maybe we need a new thread).
SovCit Peter Christian Jensen IV is suing an Idaho Transportation Department official for $6,689,940 (in coins only) because Jensen was required to pay fees to register his car, and insure it. He claims that the state of Idaho is an artificial person created by laws to govern, and under the reasoning of Mosaic Law, state laws are “fiction.”

I generally think that our law enforcement agents are too quick to use a taser but there are exceptions.

Is it GOOD for the local population[s] of carrion-eaters to provide them with a glutted food supply for one (and likely ONLY one) season?

Or is there some expectation that the wackos preventing a roundup would stand idly by and permit federal employees to haul away the carcasses?