Why would you wonder that? Have you followed the situation as it exists on the ground? There seems to be no problem for people to come and go as they please.
They are only anti-government when they don’t get to suck from the dole. This is why they went batshit crazy when the BLM wanted to add basic environmental protections to their lease and it is why they will still use the post office.
It is typical selfish neo-libertarian BS they will suck from the tit as long they can do it there way and as long as brown or non-christian people aren’t allowed to suckle too.
They use the writings of people like John Stuart Mill like most true-believers, picking and choosing what fits their needs while ignoring the core concepts that do not.
They may hold the idea of John Stuart Mill and John Locke in reverence but they do not hold those men’s ideas to the same level.
As an example from “On Liberty” by John Stuart Mill, which would make most self-called libertarians brains explode.
Contrast this with their very public statements on african americans or non-christians or the poor.
So lets put these people in their proper category. They are spoiled, bigoted, selfish white men whom feel insulted that their landlord wanted to put new conditions on the lease. Their only higher cause is to get what they want via the backs of others but they do not want to offer the same in kind.
So yes, they will use the federal mail if it suits their purpose.
The words of FU:
The Black Lives Matter movement, they can go and protest, close freeways down and all that stuff, and they don’t get any backlash, not on the level that we’re getting… their level of protesting is different; we’re not obstructing schools.
So we could discuss schools in the area being kept shuttered fttb, and whose fault that might be.
As long as the government allows them to seize land through an act of sedition unchallenged.
Let us examine some of Ammon Bundy’s statements.
He had directly threatened violence if the goverment tries to enforce the law and he has admitted he committed an act of terrorism
Note that the Hammonds, in an attempt to cover up their poaching set fires which destroyed buildings and put lots of firefighters at risk. Their judge gave them a good old boy sentence that did not meet the federal minimum guidelines. How many black youth do you think the Bundy’s would have run to to help.
Also note that this act of terror was inspired by a divine calling in his mind, how is this any different than if an islamic group had decided to acted on a jihad?
So yes, they let people come and go, unless the feds come and then people will die.
Cite for the Hammond’s crimes:
Fire #1
Fire #2
Don’t fall for the BS that the government is doing wrong here. These jerks almost killed people and a lot of non-white people are rotting for 5 years in prison for having just 29 grams crack on them.
The NEA’s fault, of course.
These guys also like to embellish (or invent entirely) their military careers. One said he was a Ranger…flat out lie. Mostly these losers are dudes who failed in the military and now want to play soldier when there is no real danger.
https://www.facebook.com/blaine.cooper23/videos/vb.100002585440114/926511377445035/?type=2&theater
Yes, they are asking for snacks, as well as donations through a hate Islam website.
Ritzheimer is the Draw Mohammed goober. He doesn’t give a shit about ranchers, he just wants to kill feds.
So, do I have this right:
“We’re not asking for money… Here’s where you can send money… We’re not asking for money”
:rolleyes:
And never mind that the website is for a different delusional cause as well.
I am tempted to send a postcard to the general mail address, asking them to please match their sedition into the bottom of the ocean.
Pretty much everyone has paid a tax at some point in their lives. Just like everyone has spent time in their lives not paying taxes.
The Constitution also gives Congress “power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.”
See elaboration of the nonpartisan federal view of this (PDF). The perspectives of the Heritage Foundation may also be of interest, particularly that “the Framers intended the Property Clause to be broad enough at least to constitutionalize the provisions of the Northwest Ordinance.”
Send them some carelessly packaged lunchmeat that has been left in the sun too long. With mayo.
Yes and these states agreed to such provisions in their constitutions.
Someone outside wouldn’t be allowed inside anyway.
His heroes are two rednecks who deliberately set a forest fire to cover up their illegal poaching. Do I have that much right? That’s what this dickhead is defending? Criminal greedy arsonists? And why is it that every little imbecile now thinks he’s a constitutional expert, knowing more than the courts??
What has this country come to? I certainly don’t remember this sort of idiocy in the 20th century. Was it there and I just wasn’t paying attention?
I’m assuming it would be someone who’s working with them. I don’t think they’d let someone who wasn’t a trusted supporter pick up their mail.