Nonsense. Male Sikhs wear turbans not because they’re being subjugated by religion, but because they are respecting their religious customs. The same goes for the hijab.
And anyway, how does all of this impact your way of life and why should we even blink an eye at it?
As long as they deal with me (and all the others in line, of course) quickly and efficiently when I get to the counter or window, I don’t care if they’re wearing a turban, a cross, a hijab, a yarmulke, or any other religious symbol.
Turbans and hijabs are not the same - if my husband and I visit a fundamentalist Muslim country, he will not be required to cover his head, but I more-or-less will.
Female oppression in Canada does affect me; every woman who is oppressed is making it just that little bit worse for all Canadian women. Equal rights for women are a very new thing, and certainly not something that is universal in the world; I think we need to be very careful not to lose them.
ETA: You snuck in on me while I was researching, Spoons.
So, playing devil’s advocate, years ago I attended a Jewish wedding and was asked to wear a yarmulke. I wore it with pride for my Jewish friends getting married. I didn’t feel oppressed. I rather liked participating in the ceremony.
Why would you feel oppressed if you were visiting a Muslim country and were asked to abide by accepted cultural standards?
ETA: At the wedding my wife didn’t have to wear any religious headgear.
Margaret Wente is the lovely person who got caught plagiarizing and never apologized, somehow kept her job, and afterward wrote a column about how students these days expect the world handed them on a platter and don’t work hard enough and anyway should only study in lucrative fields. (She has a BA in English.) “Bitchy” doesn’t even begin to describe what a piece of work she is.
Appeals to bigotry didn’t really help the PQ in the last election, we’ll just have to hope it doesn’t this time, either. (Also, it’s the PQ’s proposal, not “Quebec’s proposal”.)
The first two assertions could stand some evidence, and the third needs an argument. Care to provide some?
In general, using the idea in law that people’s religious choices can be ignored as “indoctrination” is so obviously a justification for oppression that I’m not sure it deserves a counterargument.
I need evidence to suggest that people who aren’t raised in Jesus are unlikely to become followers? How many convert to Odinism as adults?
Regardless of whether I think it is indoctrination or not doesn’t stop me from ignoring your religion. Have I said you should be oppressed because of your religion? No.
And to answer Leaffan as to why I should care. Financially, by not taxing religion, I am effectively forced to subsidize it. Morally, by not standing up to the misogynistic practices that some religions require of their followers, I am effectively condoning them. By condoning them, I allow them to continue. I’ll remember your argument when someone decides that gays shouldn’t be allowed to marry (a very religious attitude). Whether they can or can not, doesn’t affect me in the slightest…at least according to your argument.
John Beckwith’s ‘Blurred Lines’, from 1997, is enjoying an unexpected revival due to the fact it has the same name as some other song. I’ve no idea if there is a video with naked women planned.
So, what’s the consensus on the Justin Trudeau’s pot smoking admission?
I would be surprised if anyone of his, my, our generation didn’t try it actually. He’s 9 years younger than me, but really, it’s so prevalent that pretty much everyone has given it a try.
I think it’s somewhat refreshing that he told the truth, although perhaps not the whole truth. Kinda reminded me of Paul McCartney’s confession all those years ago.