The Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. Saga Continues: Sanctions Now $20,000

[pravnik]

Another little treasure from Dr. Orly Esq.'s other pending case in California: U.S. District Judge David O. Carter has issued a scheduling order setting a tentative trial date of January 28, 2010, pending resolution of the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Orly, Keyes and the rest of the gang immediately hailed it as a huge victory - they had a trial date!! The judge wouldn’t set a trial date if he was ultimately going to dismiss their case, would he?? (Answer: yes, he would. They do it all the time. A tentative trial date on a scheduling order is purely clerical and has no bearing on substantive issues). In light of their huge victory, Orly had her disbarred assistant Charles Lincoln send an email to the U.S. Attorneys handling their case.

From: Charles Lincoln [mailto:charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:11 AM
To: Dejute, David (USACAC); West, Roger (USACAC)
Subject: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.

Dear Messers DeJute & West:
Dr. Taitz has asked me to ask you whether you are willing to stipulate that, now that the Scheduling Order has been made final, rather than moot, that it is now time for us to begin discovery. We need to start sending out notices of deposition duces tecum to parties and subpoenas duces tecum to non-parties. The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.
Charles E. Lincoln, Research Associate & Law Clerk for Dr. Taitz, Esq., Attorney
for the Plaintiffs.

The reply (please note the language setting on the heading):

Von: “West, Roger (USACAC)” <Roger.West4@usdoj.gov>
An: Charles Lincoln <charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 7. Oktober 2009, 11:31:18 Uhr
Betreff: RE: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.

Nuts.

[Carl_Corey]

Wait. Mad Anthony McAuliffe works for the courts now?

[Ravenman]

How can you trust any lawyer with a rocketmail account? I mean, being crazy is one thing, but being crazy from 1997 is just way too much to handle.

[pravnik]

@Carl_Corey

Wait. Mad Anthony McAuliffe works for the courts now?

The best part is that Lincoln and Taitz didn’t seem to get the reference. Their response:

From: Charles Lincoln [mailto:charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:11 PM
To: West, Roger (USACAC)
Cc: Dr. Orly Taitz
Subject: AW: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.

Dear Mr. West:
Unless you can provide us with a more thoughtful answer and analysis of the
situation, or can you ask Mr. DeJute to do so, We will report your Laconic response below
to Judge Carter as the full and final statement of the United States’ well-considered
position in this case.

West’s response:

Von: West, Roger (USACAC) (Roger.West4@usdoj.gov)
An: Charles Lincoln
Datum: Mittwoch, den 7. Oktober 2009, 12:17:38 Uhr
Betreff: RE: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.

You are obviously not a student of military history. Because you appear confused, let me be clear. Per Judge
Carter’s order, discovery is stayed in this case. We will not agree to any discovery in this case at this time.

[Yllaria]

I am also not a student of military history. Could someone please give the background for the “nuts” reply?

[Captain_Amazing]

During the Battle of the Bulge, the 101st Airborne was stuck in Bastogne, where it was surrounded by a larger German force. The Germans asked them to surrender, and their commander, General McAuliffe, sent back the single word “nuts” as a response.

[Yllaria]

Thanks.

[silenus]

Not very often does someone get to make an historical reference, legal response and a psychological evaluation at the same time!

[Gorsnak]

I’ve been trying to find a cite that pravnik’s reported email is real, because it seems too good to be true.

Anyone care to guess what sort of results one gets upon googling “orly taitz nuts”?

[OttoDaFe]

@Gorsnak

I’ve been trying to find a cite that pravnik’s reported email is real, because it seems too good to be true.

Anyone care to guess what sort of results one gets upon googling “orly taitz nuts”?

An overflow error on the Google server’s hit counter, followed immediately by the collapse of civilization. Which would be (almost) worth it if it meant we would never hear of this bitch again.

[Kamino_Neko]

@Gorsnak

Anyone care to guess what sort of results one gets upon googling “orly taitz nuts”?

Google throws up the sentence ‘No shit, Sherlock’?

[E-Sabbath]

@Gorsnak

I’ve been trying to find a cite that pravnik’s reported email is real, because it seems too good to be true.

Discovery Stipulation Request Email | PDF

Mr. Lincoln doesn’t get it.

Discovery Stipulation Request Update | PDF | Government

[Princhester]

Barack Hussein Obama and his cronies in the courts and at the DoJ sure are working hard to avoid having to give discovery of Barack Hussein Obama’s True Real Birth Certificate.

Personally I Think They have Something To hide.

[pravnik]

Unsuprisingly, she’s appealing. Her notice of appeal uses a lot of bolding and CAPITALIZATION to show that she is VERY SERIOUS.

Notice of Appeal

[kaylasdad99]

@pravnik

Unsuprisingly, she’s appealing. Her notice of appeal uses a lot of bolding and CAPITALIZATION to show that she is VERY SERIOUS.

If Orly Taitz is appealing, it’s only because of the existence of Rule 34.

[pravnik]

@kaylasdad99

If Orly Taitz is appealing, it’s only because of the existence of Rule 34.

I knew there was a joke in there somewhere.

[Skywatcher]

@pravnik

“The Court does not make this observation simply as a rhetorical device for emphasis; the Court has actually received correspondence assailing its previous order in which the sender, who, incidentally, challenged the undersigned to a ‘round of fisticuffs on the Courthouse Square,’ asserted that the President is not human.”

Must’ve been from an Icky.